Who are you more likely to help? Relationship status and empathy predict helping
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Problem/Purpose: Bystander effect refers to the idea that people are less likely to help someone in need when there are other people present. Instead a negative relationship is present, in that a person’s feeling of responsibility to help decreases as the number of other bystanders increases. The current study is examining factors that might better predict engaging in helping behaviors. Past research has found that empathy plays a role in situations, and that as people relate to others’ experiences, they feel an increased need to help and engage in helping behaviors (Paciello et al., 2013). Sierksma and colleagues (2014) examined helping behavior in children by giving them vignettes and asking how likely they would help in those situations. They found that the children were more likely to help in the situations where a friend was present, compared to if there was a stranger or no one present. Thus, the question remains whether empathy is only influential depending upon the relationship to the victim. That is, would individuals be more likely to intervene if the helping behavior affected a friend compared to a stranger. The current study examined the influence of empathy, in conjunction with the relationship status to the victim, to determine likelihood of helping. Procedure: This study is a 2(victim status: friend, stranger) X 2(effort: low, high) double-blind mixed method experiment. Specifically, participants are randomly assigned to read nine vignettes that vary on relationship to victim, report their likelihood to help, and level of effort (i.e., low effort, high effort) they are willing to exert while helping. After completing the vignettes, participants will complete the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ; Spreng, McKinnon, Mar, & Levine, 2009). Expected Results: Data collection is still underway, but it is expected that helping behavior will be higher for friends than for strangers on general helping. It is also expected that empathy will be positively correlated with general helping behavior. Conclusion and Implications: When someone is needing help, it isn’t always obvious and our first instinct to do. It can be hard to know how to help. This study examines varying ways the participants could help in each scenario and determines which factor (e.g., relationship status, empathy) may play a role in their helping behavior. By understanding those factors, psychologists could provide education and guidelines that help increase engagement in pro-social behavior. Perhaps, we can teach individuals how to become a more proactive bystander.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».