AU mens basketball team looks to turn defense, rebounding into wins, November 11, 2011
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
AU mens basketball team looks to turn defense, rebounding into wins 11/11/11 ALFRED, NY -When the Alfred University men's basketball team opens its 2011-12 season Nov. 15, the team will have a different look than it has the first three year's of head coach Dale Wellman's tenure at the Saxons' helm.A smaller, three-guard lineup that emphasized quickness and a turnover-producing perimeter defense will be replaced by rotations that provide size and a post presence aimed at reversing a glaring rebounding disadvantage from a season ago."We'llbe playing different this year.We want to be a bigger basketball team, with taller players, because last year we were really hurt by rebounding," Wellman said.Indeed, the Saxons (8-17, 3-13 Empire 8) were outrebounded by an averaged of 41-34 per game last season.Many of the opponents' boards -nearly 14 per game -were of the offensive variety, leading to many second-chance scoring opportunities."Thebig thing this year will be defense and rebounding.That's what we're focused on," he said."Offensively, this will give us a good inside-outside game.The bigger players will give us a better post attack and that will open things up for out outside game and penetration.And we want more scoring in transition, so we want guys on the court who can really turn things up defensively."AUhas the players to improve on its post play and rebounding this year.Junior Center Bryan Bobo (Ontario, NY/Wayne) and senior forward Pat Hollenbeck (Ontario, NY/Wayne) return, as does senior forward Derek Lewis (Horseheads, NY/Horseheads).At 6-5 and 6-4 respectively, Bobo and Hollenbeck will be counted on to assert themselves in the post from a rebounding standpoint (they averaged 4.4 and 1.8 boards per game, respectively in 2010-11) and as scorers (Bobo averaged 4.9 points; Hollenbeck scored 2.9).Lewis, at 6-5, averaged 5.8 points and 4.9 rebounds last season, but did so while playing much of the time around the perimeter.He'll be counted on to provide more production in the paint this year."I'd love for those three guys to average five or six rebounds," Wellman said.A welcome addition in the frontcourt is freshman forward Dan Totten (Red Hook, NY/Red Hook), who Wellman said will be counted on to be a factor immediately.The 6-5 Totten is an energetic post player who Wellman expects will contribute on the offensive and defensive glass while playing solid post defense."He's unbelievably active all the time.He goes after everything," Wellman said of Totten."As an interior player, he can hit the mid-range jumper and get after the offensive boards."Of6-3 junior forward Brett Dennis (Webster, NY/Webster-Schroeder), who averaged just under two points and one redound in limited time a season ago, Wellman said, "He plays had on defense and rebounds the ball.His effort alone will get him on the court."While on the smaller side, 6-2 sophomore Michael Branche (Schenectady, NY/Colonie) will be counted on to play a role at the forward position.He missed some time to injury his freshman year, playing in only 16 games, but still managed to score 2.7 point and pull down 2.1 rebounds in just over 11 minutes of play each contest."(Branche)did all he could to rebound the ball and play defense, and he's really developed a solid inside-
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».