MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7055122158

Chemical and Biological Measures of Heavy Metal Bioavailability and Toxicity in Soil

2014· article· en· W7055122158 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueMagnetic confinement fusion research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBioavailabilityEarthwormSoil waterMetal toxicityCadmiumSoil contaminationToxicityEisenia fetidaContaminationOrganic matter
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This study was conducted to better understand the bioavailability and toxicity of cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) to soil organisms, both as individual contaminants and as mixtures. To adequately protect or restore soil ecosystems there is a great need to characterize soils presumed to be contaminated with heavy metals. Typical chemical analyses of soils, which determine total heavy metal concentrations of soils, are not well correlated with soil organism toxicity due to a host of modifying factors such as pH, organic matter content, and clay content. Due to these modifying factors, no soil will have 100% of its metal content bioavailable to organisms. Only bioavailable metals in soil are able to exert toxic action. Bioavailable metals cannot be directly measured using chemical analyses- only living organisms determine bioavailability. Laboratory toxicity tests, in which soil organisms are exposed to contaminated soils, are routinely used to evaluate toxicity and/or contaminant bioavailability, but are time consuming, expensive, and often difficult to interpret. The goal of this research was to investigate surrogate measures of metal bioavailability that would not only be inexpensive and precise, but also relate directly to toxicity.Three methods of measuring metal bioavailability in soils were investigated: i) earthworm metal residues; ii) weak electrolyte soil extractions; and iii) ion-exchange membrane uptake. Single- and multiple-metal toxicity tests using the earthworm Eisenia fe/ida and ion-exchange membrane exposures were conducted in artificial soil spiked III with metal salts and remediated/unremediated Zn-smelter contaminated and reference field soils. Toxic units were calculated from the single-metal tests in artificial soil in order to evaluate mixture toxicity of the multiple-metal test. During all artificial soil toxicity tests, dead earthwonns were analyzed to determine critical body residues (CBRs) for lethality for each metal. CBRs are concentrations oftoxicants in an organism associated with a toxic endpoint, providing a link between the measure of bioavailability (the residue) and toxicity. CBRs were also used to further investigate mixture toxicity. All soils were extracted with a weak electrolyte (0.1M Ca(N03)2) hypothesized to extract exchangeable or weakly bound "available" metals in soil. Plant Root Simulators� (PRSTM, Western Ag Innovations, Saskatoon, SK, Canada), ion-exchange membranes coated with disodium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), were exposed to artificial soils at the same concentrations as the earthwonn toxicity tests and remediated field soils. Ca(N03h-extractable metals and PRS uptake were compared to toxicity (mortality) and/or earthworm metal uptake to assess their use as surrogate measures of bioavai lability. The acute mixture toxicity of Cd, Pb, and Zn was additive (LCso of approximately I toxic unit) regardless of the manner in which toxicity was quantitatively expressed. Earthworm metal concentrations were well related to lethality, and enabled the estimation ofLCsos using critical body residues (CBRs, LCBRsos), which were 5.72 (3.54-7.91),3.33 (2.97-3.69), and 8.19 (4.78-11.6) mmollkg (�95% confidence interval) for Cd, Pb, and Zn, respectively. Zn concentrations of dead earthworms exposed to a lethal remediated Zn-smelter soil were 3-fold above the LCBRso for Zn and comparable to earthworm concentrations in lethal Zn-spiked artificial soils, despite a 14-fold difference in total soil Zn concentration between the lethal field and artificial soils. Metal concentrations in different methodological fractions of the earthworm tissue showed promise as measures ofbioavailability at sublethal exposure levels. Weak-electrolyte (0.1M Ca(N03h) extractable metals in soil were precisely related to toxicity in all artificial toxicity tests. Ca(N03n,-extractable Zn was comparable between the lethal Znspiked artificial and lethal remediated Zn-smelter soils, despite the aforementioned differences in soil parameters. Zn uptake in both live and dead earthworms was also well related to Ca(N03h-extractable Zn regardless of soil type (R2 =0.96), but poorly related to total soil Zn. Iun-exchange membrane metal uptake in soil was not well related to toxicity or earthworm metal uptake in metal-spiked artificial or remediated Zn-smelter soil.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,432
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,990

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,218
Écart entre enseignants0,191 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma)Même sujetMagnetic confinement fusion researchTravaux en français237 207