Comparative Study of the Regulations and Protocols Published in Spain by the Autonomous Communities after the Declaration of the State of Alarm Derived from COVID-19
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The situation that occurred after the declaration of the state of alarm in our country has led to the suspension of on-site educational activity in centers during the last quarter of the 2019/2020 academic year and a new conception in the organization and development of educational processes during the course 2020/2021. All this has led to the deployment of rules and action protocols, both at the national and regional levels, in order to safeguard the fundamental right to education of our minors in combination with the right to health protection through preventive measures that the health authorities have adopted for educational centers.This article presents the results obtained in the documentary analysis phase of the research project developed, after reviewing 149 standards and protocols published by the Government and the regional educational administrations. It has been used the technique of variance analysis through the search for key terms among the elements of study, which allows to establish generalizations explained by interpretation of diversity, which lead to the identification of key factors in the improvement of educational systems related to inclusion, quality and equity.For the systematization of the analysis process, 36 indicators classified into four study categories have been used around the measures adopted with the students, with the teaching staff, curricular and pedagogical and, finally, organizational.The study highlights the dispersion of existing regulations in terms of volume and type, as well as the difficulty in some cases of accessing documents. Likewise, it confirms the intensity in the work carried out by the administrations at the beginning of the 2020/2021 academic year, but not in its development, which is left in the hands of the educational centers, given the lack of indications at the end of the 2019/2020 academic year. Among the coincident aspects, the following stand out: the proposal of reinforcement and support plans stands out, the importance of communication with families, the availability of unspecified resources, the need for teacher training in digital competence, the adaptation of the documents of the centers (plans of orientation and tutorial action and didactic programming), the evaluation and promotion criteria, the contingency and digitization plans, as well as the aspects related to the new COVID organization. In contrast, absenteeism, the decrease in ratios or the means directed at teachers are not dealt with in a general way.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,101 | 0,148 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,009 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».