Defining and Aligning Expectations: A Hermeneutic Phenomenological Study of the Expectations of Professional Academic Advisors and Undergraduate Students
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation investigated the expectations both professional academic advisors and undergraduate students, respectively, possessed of academic advising and of the advisor role. As students come to their postsecondary endeavors with increased needs, expectations, and consumer-mentalities, it is important to understand their expectations – and meet those expectations – to improve student satisfaction with advising (Propp & Rhodes, 2006). Given the increased use of professional academic advisors across higher education institutions, the literature does not speak to their expectations of academic advising. It is also difficult to ascertain how to best perform academic advising to meet student expectations in various contexts because there is a lack of standardization within the academic advising profession (Johnson et al., 2019). Although mass standardization is not the goal (Menke, Duslak, & McGill, 2020), academic advising should be purposefully structured based on institutional and student characteristics (Ender, Winston & Miller, 1982), the strengths of different advisor types (Allen & Smith, 2008a; Reinarz, 2000), and student needs (NACADA, 2005) and expectations (Anderson et al., 2014). Therefore, this hermeneutic phenomenological study explored students’ and professional academic advisors’ expectations of academic advising and of the advisor’s role. Through document review, semi-structured interviews, reflective journaling, and member reflections, I analyzed the lived experiences of students and advisors in order to understand how their expectations converge and diverge. Two of the main findings of the study were a.) previous experiences, in various ways, informed both advisor and student expectations, and b.) student and advisor expectations were aligned in terms of important skills for advisors to demonstrate and important outcomes of academic advising. The results of the study have future implications to inform advisor training and development, and the way in which advising is formally structured across and within various institutions to meet students’ needs and expectations of academic advising.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle