MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7055916438

Determining the extent to which weather-related abiotic factors influence daily variation in early benthic phase mortality of intertidal marine invertebrates

2013· article· en· W7055916438 sur OpenAlexfundno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network) · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueMagnetic confinement fusion research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesThompson Rivers University
Mots-clésBenthic zoneEctothermAbiotic componentDesiccationProductivityHabitat
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Populations of marine intertidal invertebrates vary substantially in abundance from year to year. These differences might be partly due to cohorts experiencing 60 – 99% mortality during the first few days after the transition from pelagic to benthic environments. However, the causes of this mortality, including the role of weather conditions experienced during low tide, are not well understood. This study aimed to improve our understanding of the influence of low tide environmental stress on survival through the early benthic phase by (1) determining the influence of temperature and desiccation stress on mortality of newly settled mussels and the ontogeny of sensitivity to these stresses through the early benthic phase; (2) examining the mortality of barnacle cyprids from settlement to metamorphosis and mortality of early juveniles up to the age of 10 days after metamorphosis; and (3) documenting the frequency of occurrence of lethal conditions occurring in the field at low tide during the recruitment season.\nLaboratory experiments revealed that newly settled Mytilus trossulus of 1-2 mm shell length experienced a temperature tolerance threshold at 34°C and a desiccation tolerance threshold at a vapour pressure deficit level of 1.01 kPa. Mussels became highly tolerant to desiccation stress when they reached a size of 3 mm shell length, suggesting a size threshold of desiccation tolerance between 2-3 mm shell length. This size closely corresponds to the size at which some studies have reported juvenile M. trossulus relocate from protective filamentous algal habitat to adult habitat, suggesting ontogenetic shifts in habitat use by juvenile M. trossulus may be a response to changing vulnerability to desiccation stress.\nA field survey of Balanus glandula recruitment revealed that cyprid and juvenile mortality varied greatly among daily cohorts and was significantly higher under Fucus spp. cover than on bare surfaces. Contrary to expectations, cyprid mortality was not significantly influenced by weather-related abiotic conditions. This was likely due to the study being conducted during a La Niña cycle that may have had lower temperature and desiccation stress than is typical for Barkley Sound.\nIntertidal temperatures above the threshold tolerance levels for newly settled mussels were uncommon during the recruitment season, suggesting that temperature stress is not likely an important factor influencing early benthic phase mortality of mussels. The desiccation stress threshold level for newly settled mussels was frequently exceeded for several hours during the recruitment season, however, suggesting that desiccation stress may be an important factor influencing early benthic phase mortality in mussels that settle on open surfaces. In contrast, cyprid mortality on bare surfaces was not significantly influenced by desiccation stress or any other weather-related abiotic factors. I concluded that the survival of newly settled mussels likely depends upon the presence of protective microhabitats created by filamentous and fucoid algae, whereas barnacles experience reduced survival through the early benthic phase in the presence of fucoid algae. Changes in survival of these algae due to climate change could therefore have extensive influence on mortality through the early benthic phase and may subsequently affect population and community structure.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,345
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,983

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,3450,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,215
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)Même sujetMagnetic confinement fusion researchTravaux en français237 207