DIETARY PATTERNS OF A GROUP OF CHILDREN, THEIR MOTHERS AND GRANDMOTHERS LIVING IN SASKATOON
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Information on dietary patterns is useful for nutritional epidemiology and also has applications for nutrition educators. \nThe current study had four objectives: to characterize the dietary patterns of a convenience sample of children, their biological mothers, and grandmothers, in terms of percent of energy as macronutrients, servings from food groups, and intake of selected micronutrients; to determine generational differences in dietary patterns; to determine if there was a family influence on dietary patterns; and to compare the dietary patterns of our subjects with similar \nage groups in 1970-72. \nFour days of dietary intake data, based on a combination of 24-hour recalls and 3-day diaries, were available for 76 children aged 8 to 12 years, 59 mothers aged 31 to 52 years, and 19 grandmothers aged 58 to 83 years, who were participants in bone density studies at the \nUniversity of Saskatchewan. \nThe children reported a low intake of Fruits and Vegetables per day (3.9 ± 2 servings), reflected by a lower intake of vitamin A, K, folate and fibre. The mothers' diet was high in fat, indicated by a high percent of energy as fat (36 + 6), and servings of Fats and Oils (6.0 ± 3.6). The mothers appeared least likely of the three generational groups to have implemented dietary recommendations to reduce fat and increase carbohydrate. The grandmothers' higher intake of Fruits and Vegetables was reflected in higher intakes of vitamin A, K, folate and fibre. This group was close to achieving dietary guidelines. \nA family similarity in dietary patterns was found for variables associated with fat consumption between related pairs of children and their mothers. No family similarities were found between related pairs of mothers and grandmothers. \nThe children 5-11 years, females 40-64 years, and females 65+ years, had higher carbohydrate and lower fat intakes as percent of energy than similar age groups in 1970-1972. Our data suggests that the older women have made greater modifications to their diets since 1970 than the younger women. \nGenerational differences in dietary patterns suggest that there may have been differences in responses to nutrition recommendations and dietary guidelines. Investigation is needed into possible underlying differences in lifestyle factors, attitudes and beliefs, that impact on \ngenerational responses to dietary recommendations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».