Donald Kuspit ve Jean Baudrillard'da sanat?n sonuyla ilgili tart??malar ba?lam?nda yeni yap?t ?retme dinamikleri
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Geride kalan y?zy?l?n son ?eyre?inde; kimi sanat ele?trmenleri ve d???n?rler taraf?ndan, ortaya at?lmaya ba?lanan sanat?n sonunun geldi?i s?ylemlerinin, t?m d?nyada pek ?ok d?zlemde kendisine tart??ma alan? buldu?u bilinmektedir. G?n?m?z sanat?nda hi?bir ?eyin bir di?erine kar??t olmad???n? savunan Baudrillard, bu durumun ger?ek olanla ger?e?in temsili olan?n yer de?i?tirmesine neden oldu?una ve ger?ek olan?n, kendi yerini benze?imine terketti?ine dikkat ?eker. Trilling'in, Baudrillard'?n g?r???ne ko?ut duran; ?Sanat?n, daha ?nce e?i g?r?lmedik bi?imde yay?ld???, eskiden pek anla??lmayan ya da itici bulunan sanat bi?imlerinin kolayl?kla kabul edildi?i, pop?ler ve ticari sanat?n, eskiden ?st d?zey sanat ad? verilen ?eyle inan?lmaz ?ekilde yan yana geldi?i?? a??klamas? baz? ger?eklik dengelerinin ciddi anlamda de?i?ti?ini kan?tlamaktad?r. Donald Kuspit, ?Sanat?n Sonu? adl? kitab?nda ele alm?? oldu?u sanat?n sonu s?recinin kayna??n?, bilin?d???n?n terkedilmesi olarak saptar. Romantizmle beraber ba?lam?? olan bilin?d???n?n ke?fini sanat?n esin kayna?? olarak g?r?r ve bilin?d??? k?lt?n?n ??k???'n? sanat?n sonuna dair bir t?r milad olarak, sonun ba?lang?c? olarak niteleyen Kuspit, bu ??k??le, hem modern sanat?n, hem de sanat?n sonunun geldi?ini iddia eder. 20. y?zy?l?n ikinci yar?s?nda ortaya ??kan sanatsal/d???nsel hareketler ve bunlar?n resim sanat?n?n s?regelen ser?venine etkileri bilinmektedir. G?n?m?z sanat ortam?, ?retme y?ntemleri, sanat??n?n yaratma edimi ve dinamikleri d???n?ld???nde, 1960'tan bug?ne sanat?n zamanda ald??? yol ?a??rt?c? derecede ?e?itlilik arz etmektedir. Modernist resimle ba?layarak sanat eserinde meydana gelen k?r?lmaya de?in ge?en s?recin hareketlendirdi?i periyot, i?erik itibariyle sanat kar??-sanat fl?rt?n? b?nyesinde bar?nd?rmaktad?r. Bu paradoksun ortaya ??kard??? tabloya bak?larak sanat ortamlar?n?n ?e?itlendi?i s?ylenebilir. Ancak bu ?o?ullu?un zenginle?me mi, yoksa bir t?r y???nla?mas? m? oldu?u sorusunun cevaps?z kald??? da a?ikard?r. As it?s known, in the last quarter of the last century, the speculations about the imminent end of the arts proposed by some critics and philosophers have found a great platform as can be seen all over the world. Baudrillard; arguing the idea that there is nothing against the other in the contemporary art; attracts our attention to this situation?s being the reason for replacing the matter of being reality and being the representation of reality. The explanation of Trilling paralleling Baudrillard?s concept saying ?art is spreading out as never seen before, the art forms which are admitted repulsive before and do not make sense are easily accepted, the popular and commercial arts come together with the art called higher-up in the past in an unbelievable way?? proves that some reality balances have changed substantially. Donald Kuspit determines the source of the end of the art process which he dealt with in his book called ?the end of art?, as the dereliction of the subconsciousness. He considers the discovery of the unconscious that started with the Romantism as the source of inspration and describing the decadence of unconscious cult as a kind of turning point concerning the end of arts. Kuspit claims that within this collapse both the modern arts and the arts itself have reached the endpoint. The artistic/ideological movements and their effects on the on-going story of the painting, which emerged in the second half of the 20th century, are known. Considering the present-day art environment, producing techniques, the creativity deed and the Dynamics of the artist, since the 1960 the way arts cruised over time is seen to vary impressively. The period by the process with the modernist painting until the break in the work of art, in respect to the content contains the flirting of art-vs art. Looking at the statement brought out by this paradox it can be said that the art ambiances have varied. However, it is obvious that the question asking what if this plurality is an enrichment or an agglomeration still remains unanswered.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,010 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,093 | 0,033 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».