Influence of the thrombectomy parameters on the efficacy in the acute stroke with large vessel occlusion treatment
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is an acute impairment of brain function caused by a central nervous system focal injury of a vascular origin. The cause is a sudden blockage of blood flow to the brain neural tissue caused by arterial occlusion. AIS is the second most common primary cause of death in Europe, accounting for 9% of deaths in men and 12% of deaths in women annually. Moreover, mortality within the first month after the incident is around 30%. Half of the survivors lose their independence in everyday life, as it is the leading cause of long-term disability. From a socio-economic point of view, AIS represents a major public health burden worldwide, mainly due to the high hospitality rate of severely disabled patients and consequently high costs of rehabilitation and medical care. The main goals of AIS treatment are the recanalization of occluded blood vessels and potential reperfusion of remained viable brain tissue. Until 2015, the only proven reperfusion technique was the application of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) administered less than 4.5 hours from symptom onset. However, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) promoted an endovascular treatment approach and proved that mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is safe and effective for the treatment of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACLVO), in comparison with traditional AIS treatment. Although MT is currently an accepted standard of care, there are still a lot of pending questions to be clarified. For instance, issues about widening MT indications, best technique, practical organization, minimal required imaging, type of anesthesia, patient triage and transport, the best management of tandem occlusion (TO), and the influence of the clot composition on retrieval efficacy need to be additionally clarified in future. Another major issue is the applicability of RCTs results achieved in the well-organized centers and in highly-controlled settings, compared to a real-world situation, especially in developing country medical systems which are dealing with lack of trained personnel, shortage of appropriate financial and material support, lower basic health level of the population, etc. Therefore, this dissertation aimed to evaluate the influence of different thrombectomy parameters on the treatment of AIS in Belgrade and Toulouse cohort study populations.\nMaterial and methods: This double center observational cohort study with the pragmatic care trial context for AIS patients treated with MT included data from 284 patients at Toulouse University prospective stroke registry and data from 82 patients at The Clinical Center of Serbia prospective stroke registry. Clinical and radiological data collection of treated cases were from January 2015 to January 2017 at Toulouse University center, and from January 2018 to January 2020 at The Clinical Center of Serbia. Moreover, additional collected data related to the anesthesia management during MT procedure in the Toulouse mono-center cohort were for the period from January 2014 until July 2016. The eligible cases were selected using the following inclusion criteria: (1) verified ACLVO by computed tomography (CT) angiography or magnetic resonance (MR) angiography; (2) MT initiated within the 6 hours from symptoms onset regardless of the use of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA). On the other hand, the exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) presence of intracranial hemorrhage (on MR or CT); (2) absence of the ACLVO; (3) small artery occlusion (distal from M2 division of the middle cerebral artery) or in the territory of posterior circulation (vertebrobasilar distribution); (4) MT initiated after 6 hours from symptom onset; (5) age below 18 years. From prospective stroke databases of both centers, several parameters were collected: clinical data (age, gender, pre-treatment National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, side of occlusion, level of occlusion, use of IV tPA, and type of anesthesia), time metrics (time of stroke onset, time of arrival at the stroke center, time of imaging, time of arrival in the angio-suite, time of arterial puncture (AP) and time of recanalization/last image), imaging data (on MR or CT),the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was calculated on\ndiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) or CT to assess the extent of the ischemic core, endovascular treatment data and angiographic outcome on modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score, and safety and clinical outcomes (complications and intracranial hemorrhage, stroke severity measured on the NIHSS at 24h, the degree of disability assessed on modified...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».