MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7057144606

International Students

2009· article· en· W7057144606 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueIllinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueLaser Design and Applications
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChinatownReading (process)Asian studiesClass (philosophy)Study abroadEveryday lifeAsian games
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

09spAAS199:09spAAS199 is a freshman at the University of Illinois.She is majoring in Kinesiology and Nutrition and plans to start a career in Sports physical therapy.She is an outgoing individual that loves learning something new every day.She decided to take an Asian American studies class because in her building where she resides, she noticed that there were many international students, especially from Asia.She wanted to know a little bit more about their culture because she interacts with them almost everyday and wanted to grasp a better understanding of certain ways they go about certain aspects of daily life.After doing research and reading more about the life of young Asians and Asian Americans, she has learned a lot about not only the culture but a lot about herself.Shaunette: I am a freshman at the University of Illinois.I took this Asian American Youth course because I have always been interested in the Asian American culture.I attended a grammar school in Chicago's Chinatown when I was a child and I currently live with two Asian American students, as well as an international student from Shanghai, China.I believe that the Asian culture is a beautiful and exotic culture and I enjoyed learning more about it in this class.Minsoo: The most valuable advantage for author is abundant and diverse experience.Author has experience of schooling in Australia International School in Singapore for a year, and has experience of studying in American International School in Philippines for the high school.Living in those countries and interacting with people with different nationalities, author has achieved plenty of cultural experiences and language skills.Moreover, by learning Chinese and Japanese, author could understand the culture deeper and sometimes live as Chinese, Japanese, Pilipino and Korean.Therefore, during the research, author has full of confident in understanding international students in UIUC.Unfortunately, sometimes author miss the huge differences between one culture and the other culture since both cultures are accustomed to him.As a result, author finally figured out details about international students and following results based on his data collection and his own experiences.Nancy: When I learned that one fifth of the girls I met from my residence hall are international students, I was very surprised and I was even more surprised as I know more about their backgrounds.Some of them are originated from different Asian countries such as Korea, India, Taiwan and China, but they moved to other countries -like Canada and Russia-in their young age.This makes me interest in finding their reasons to pursuit their college education at this particular institution in United States after they attended many various schools in different countries.Minjung: As a 1.5 generation immigrant in the United States, I have encountered both international students and second generations during my high school year.When I came to University of Illinois, I noticed unusually large number of international students.Since then, I have always wondered why there are so many international students in this specific university.In my first year in UIUC, I got a chance in my Asian American Studies Class to investigate about reasons that affect international students to choose UIUC.Since I am a Korean, I was able to interview a Korean international student.And I made ethnographical observations to find out why so many international students chose UIUC.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,762
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,230
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueIllinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)Même sujetLaser Design and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207