INTEGRATED STRIPE RUST MANAGEMENT OF BREAD WHEAT
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Stripe rust, caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, affects wheat production in Canada. Two effective strategies to control this disease are the deployment of cultivars with stripe rust resistance, and the use of fungicides when susceptible and moderately resistant cultivars are grown under high stripe rust risk conditions.\nThe effect of fungicide application timing on hard red spring wheat cultivars varying in stripe rust resistance was determined at two seeding dates in central Saskatchewan from 2012 to 2016. Under high disease pressure at a mid-May seeding date, a single fungicide application at the mid-flower growth stage of wheat decreased disease severity to 26% compared with the unsprayed control at 87% for the susceptible cultivar ‘AC Barrie’; the magnitude of the response was somewhat less for the moderately resistant cultivar ’CDC Imagine’. There was a significant yield increase of 59% when the fungicide was applied to the susceptible cultivar at mid-flower. Similar effects of fungicide application were observed for protein content, test weight and thousand-kernel weight. Furthermore, at a later seeding date (early June) fungicide application at stem elongation and at mid-flower growth stages of wheat had the same positive effect of reducing stripe rust symptoms from 87% to 51 and 54% and increasing yield by 53 and 46%, respectively for the susceptible cultivar “AC Barrie’. A fungicide application had no effect on the stripe rust resistant cultivar ‘Lillian’ at either seeding date; however, it did reduce leaf-spotting diseases on this cultivar. The study demonstrated that a single fungicide application reduces stripe rust severity, increases yield and improves grain quality in the susceptible and moderately resistant wheat cultivars used in this experiment at the mid-May seeding date. At the early June seeding date, fungicide reduced disease severity of the susceptible and moderately resistant cultivars, but increased yield only for the susceptible cultivar.\nSpelt (Triticum aestivum ssp. spelta), a sub-species of wheat, has been included in varietal development programs because its unique genetic composition makes it easy to cross with bread wheat to introgress desirable traits such as improved grain quality and stripe rust resistance. It has been found that spelt carries race-specific resistance gene Yr5, which confers resistance to all known P. striiformis f. sp. tritici races in North America. The stripe rust resistance of two spelt genotypes, CDC Silex and 10Spelt17, was studied by analyzing populations from crosses with the susceptible bread wheat cultivar ‘Avocet’. Based on growth chamber testing, the adult plant resistance of these spelt genotypes was shown to be conferred by at least two genes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,213 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».