An Intensive Cultural Resources Survey of Frontier Communications Corporation’s Proposed Amistad Electric Line Project in Val Verde County, Texas
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
On 26 October 2017, Horizon Environmental Services, Inc. (Horizon) conducted an intensive cultural resources survey of Frontier Communications Corporation’s (FCC) proposed Amistad Electric Line Project in southeastern Val Verde County, Texas (Project Area). The undertaking will be privately funded and will not require any federal permits. However, it is located on property within the Amistad National Recreation Area, a federal property maintained by the National Park Service (NPS). As the undertaking is located on federal property, it is regulated by the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) of 1979 and the Antiquities Act (AA) of 1906. On behalf of FCC, Whitenton Group (Whitenton) contracted with Horizon to conduct the cultural resources survey of the Project Area in compliance with the ARPA and the AA. The purpose of the cultural resources survey was to determine if any archeological sites were located within the Area of Potential Effect (APE) and, if any existed, to determine if the project had the potential to have any adverse impacts on sites listed on or considered eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The investigations were conducted under ARPA Permit No. 17-AMIS-01. The undertaking consists of the removal of old communication poles from within an existing electrical transmission line right-of-way (ROW) within the Amistad National Recreation Area. The APE for the undertaking measures approximately 1.0 miles (1.6 kilometers [km]) long by 30.0 feet (9.1 meters [m]) wide (approximately 4.0 acres). Horizon’s survey efforts resulted in the observation of a solitary chert flake on a landform in the northern extent of the Project Area. An intensive surface inspection on this landform, as well as the excavation of 10 shovel tests in the vicinity of the solitary specimen, failed to document any additional cultural materials at the location. As such, the specimen is considered an isolated find and was not documented as a formal archeological site. Site 41VV1222 is a previously recorded, low-density, prehistoric lithic scatter that is mapped in proximity to the southern extent of the Project Area. Horizon’s survey efforts failed to find any materials associated with the site within the current Project Area. However, supplemental survey efforts conducted by Jack Johnson (Amistad Park Archeologist), who has first-hand knowledge the site’s location, resulted in the reassessment of the site’s sparse deposits as well as an accurate plotting of its location on the landscape. Based on its sparse and surficial nature, the lack of temporally diagnostic implements, and the lack of preserved floral and faunal materials, it is Horizon’s opinion that site 41VV122 is ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP and that no additional investigations are warranted on the site in connection with the current undertaking. Based on the results of the cultural resources survey, it is Horizon’s opinion that the undertaking will have no adverse effect on any significant cultural resources listed on or considered eligible for listing on the NRHP within the APE. Horizon therefore recommends that FCC be allowed to proceed with the development of the Project Area relative to the jurisdiction of the ARPA and AA.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».