MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7057428367

Impact of necrotic enteritis on the growth curve and the evaluation of test parameters for measuring coccidial infection

2018· article· en· W7057428367 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueMagnetic confinement fusion research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCoccidiosisEimeria maximaClostridium perfringensEnteritisEimeriaBody weight
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Necrotic enteritis (NE) and coccidiosis are two pervasive diseases within the poultry industry.Necrotic enteritis has been shown to exhibit both immediate and sustained effects on body weight (BW) of broilers.While coccidiosis is commonly associated with NE, some reports suggest NetB+ Clostridium perfringens (CP) can cause NE in the absence of Eimeria or other predisposing factors.Three experiments were completed which evaluated the immediate effect of NE on BW and impact on the growth curve of broilers when NE was induced by various methods.In experiment 3.1, a dual infection model of Eimeria maxima (EM) and CP was compared to a non-challenged control (NC), while experiment 3.2 evaluated two different strains of EM dual infection, as well as six CP-only groups.Similarly, experiment 3.3 tested dual infection and CP-only groups.In all three experiments, BW was measured immediately before infection, then weekly through the end of the test period.In all three experiments, a decrease (p<0.05) in BW was observed immediately following the acute NE disease period of d21 -d23, with a long-term effect on the BW most clearly detected in the EM + CP dual infection models, and when high levels of CP-only were administered.Experiment 3.1 clearly maintained these differences in BW in an almost parallel fashion through the termination of the experiment on d35, with NC observed as 2,182.0± 29.5 g versus 1,967.1 ± 23.7 g in EM Guelph dual infection group (p<0.001).Experiment 3.2 resulted in a similar parallel trend iii in BW in EM M6 dual infection group compared to NC, but no statistical differences in BW with NC were observed following d22.Three groups in experiment 3.3, the EM M6 dual infection group and two CP only groups, resulted in differences (p<0.05) for several weeks following the challenge period, returning to similarity with NC by d42 and d35, respectively, but the parallel growth with NC continued to be observed through the entire trial, d56.In addition to showing the long-term impact of various forms of NE on broiler growth, these shifts can be used to measure the effects of treatments on prevention and recovery of broilers impacted by NE.With regard to coccidiosis, a variety of test parameters is used to measure the effectiveness of treatment strategies, such as lesion scores (LS), performance parameters such as body weight gain (BWG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR), and occasionally oocysts per gram of feces (OPG).Each of these parameters provide varying insight into the impact of Eimeria, may be subjective, and some are possibly influenced by non-disease related activity.Four experiments were completed that examined at least two test parameters that included BWG, LS, and OPG, for measuring the impact of coccidial infection in chickens and turkeys.In experiment 4.1, a challenged control (CC) was measured against three anti-coccidial groups (AC 1-3), while in experiments 4.2-4.4,non-challenged (NC) and CC were compared via BWG and OPG, plus LS in experiments 4.1, 4.3, and 4.4.In all experiments, an Eimeria challenge was orally administered.In experiment 4.1, CC displayed the highest BWG during the infection period and AC 3 showed the lowest at 404.55±19.69g and 327.46±15.42g, respectively (p<0.05), with a lack of statistical differences in LS.At 6 days post infection, peak oocyst shedding closely reflected BWG with the lowest knowledge.I am grateful for the people who have helped me on my way to reaching my potential, and would not be where I am today without you all.I would like to express my sincere appreciation to the members of the OARDC Poultry Health Lab.Whitney Briggs, your dedication to keeping this lab organized seems unmatched.I cannot express how much I appreciate the way you keep this lab running like a well-oiled machine, making it look easy when I know it is anything but easy.Thank you for your friendship, advice, endless assistance and patience, and for the shared laughter.Kim Wilson, thank you for your time, dedication, and always having a smile.Audrey Duff, my word guru, it is a pleasure and a privilege to have you as a friend.The constant laughter we have shared makes the days more enjoyable as they fly by.Thank you for being available, both inside and outside of the lab, to make graduate life a bit more bearable.Dr. Lisa Bielke, I am indebted to you for taking me into your lab, nurturing my potential, and helping me recognize my abilities.I am inspired by your intelligence, dedication, and work ethic and I will be forever grateful to the opportunities you have afforded me.I am excited to

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)→Même sujetMagnetic confinement fusion research→Travaux en français237 207→