MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7057567135

The Journey of a kêhtê-aya (elder): kiskisi sôhkisiwin, tâpôkêyimoh, sôhkitêhê, nâkatohkê: Memorize the Strength, Have Faith, Have a Strong Heart, Pay Attention

2024· dissertation· en· W7057567135 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2024
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueMagnetic confinement fusion research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesAcademy of Finland
Mots-clésIndigenousConversationCommodificationCurriculumIndigenous educationMemorizationEthnographyWork (physics)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I am from Onion Lake Cree Nation. I am a nêhiyaw-iskwêw (Cree woman). My first language is nêhiyawêwin/Cree. I lived with my great-grandparents until I started residential school in 1956.\nMy PhD research is based on my belief in healing, reconciling, and reclaiming Indigenous education to benefit students, families, and communities. There is a critical need to explore the role of Elders in schools. How are they used and positioned, by whom, and why?\nHow can the education system move away from inviting Elders to check box-type activities and progress to having Elders acknowledged as having integral and continuous roles in schools where their knowledge is central to shaping and informing the unfolding curriculum being lived out with children and families? These are the questions that you will find explored and discussed in the videos that comprise the core of this dissertation, focused on discussions of the commodification and changing role of Elders; cultural trauma; artivism and reparation; and healing, reconciling, and reclaiming Indigenous education for the benefit of students, families, and communities.\nAs a methodological approach, I followed the teachings shared by my mother, who is central to this work. What I did, and how and when I did it, was led by following protocol, prayer/prayer songs, and the offering of tobacco; it guided every aspect of my journey. My daily work began with smudging and prayers, the tobacco led me to invite thought leaders for the four conversations, it inspired my bookwork, and it guided my thought processes and decision making throughout my doctoral journey. Each conversation began with smudging, prayer/prayer song, and the offering of protocol to the thought leaders so that our conversation would unfold in a good way, with open eyes, ears, minds, and hearts.\nFrom January through December 2022, I spent one year in the field as an Elder/kêhtê-aya. I kept a journal of my Elder/Knowledge/Keeper requests and recorded my research to prepare for the commitment and my experience. This fieldwork was integral to planning and preparing for four video conversations with invited thought leaders. To fully understand the work asked of Elders it was necessary for me to immerse myself in the work of an Elder/Knowledge Keeper. I made a commitment to accept up to three protocol requests per week. Topics were varied from sharing opening prayers and comments, presenting on residential school history or treaties, and sitting on cultural advisory committees.\nTo prompt each conversation, I created a bookwork arising out of the conceptualization that became the focus. A bookwork is a non-book that relies on the viewer’s interaction with the object to make meaning. Each installation is a narrative that tells a story. Artists’ books, or bookworks, first emerged in the 1960s and 1970s as an expression of social and political activism, a way to “talk back” to mass production and mass media. Creating the bookworks required extensive research on the focus topic, including consulting with artists, art professors, curators and visiting art exhibits. Each bookwork took six months to a year to complete.\nMy video dissertation is a compilation of 10 videos: my introduction to the research journey, the four core conversations with thought leaders conducted in a talking circle format, each with a separate video introduction by me, and a culminating video that shares my research reflections. The videos have an accompanying transcript, in which I included the spoken Cree and I translated the Cree language into English. My doctoral work also includes an eleventh video which captures the gallery show I arranged and hosted at AKA Gallery in the Saskatoon community to profile the four bookworks and showcase the video dissertation.\nIn summary, the videos, the transcripts, the bookworks, and the gallery show are all integral pieces to my doctoral dissertation. Further, I have included a glossary of terms to accompany the viewing/reading of the videos and transcripts, and a bibliography for those individuals who want to pursue aspects of this work more deeply or for purposes that move forward their own work and thinking.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,034

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0160,005
Communication savante0,0030,004
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,205
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)→Même sujetMagnetic confinement fusion research→Travaux en français237 207→