Materijalni i procesni uslovi za zasnivanje odnosa roditelja i deteta u savremenom porodičnom pravu
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The subject of this paper are, primarily, the methods of\ndetermining and disputing maternity and paternity, regulated by the\nFamily law on the Republic of Serbia. In order to shed light on them\nin a comprehensive way, we will divide the work into four logical\nunits, ie. four chapters. In the first chapter, we will present general\nconcepts about the parent-child relationship, its basic manifestations\nand legal phenomena that are directly related to it. In the next chapter,\nwe will deal with the material and procedural aspects of the child's\nfamily status, trying to clarify its characteristics in the domestic and\nthe rights of individual European countries (France, Germany,\nAustria, Montenegro, Croatia, Russia). Therefore, we will research\nthe methods for determining maternity in domestic and comparative\nlaw, pointing out that in some countries it can be based on\nrecognition, and not only on the entry of data on the mother in the\nbirth register and, possibly, on the verdict. In the sphere of paternity\nrules, we will distinguish between marital and extramarital paternity,\nso we will underline the different conditions that must be met in\ncertain countries in order for the (ex)husband of the mother to be\nconsidered the father of the child. We will also present the different\nconditions for challenging marital paternity and the practice of the\nECHR on this issue. In the domain of extramarital paternity, we will\ncompare domestic and foreign rules on the conditions for his\nrecognition and on the possibilities of oppugning him. In the\nprocedural part of the paper, we will pay special attention to actively\nlegitimized persons for initiating litigation to determine and challenge\nmaternity and paternity, and to the deadlines prescribed in domestic\nand analyzed foreign laws.\nThe third chapter will be dedicated to the issue of\nestablishing parenthood with biomedical assistance, and in it we will\npresent the general rules on these procedures in domestic and\ncomparative law, the types of these procedures and their disputable\nelements. We will pay special attention to surrogacy, from the point\nof view of existing proposals in domestic law and positive solutions\nfrom comparative law. Given the importance of this institution, in this\npart of the research we will deal with the rights of those countries that\nwe have not studied in the course of work so far, and in which\nsurrogacy is allowed, such as Greece, Canada, Ukraine, Macedonia,\nGreat Britain and the USA. We will deal with the conditions under\nwhich it is allowed, its types (commercial and non-commercial,\ncomplete and incomplete subrogation, posthumous insemination of a\nsurrogate mother), ways and conditions of using the services of a\nsurrogate mother, contractual rights and obligations of intended\nparents and surrogate mother, status of the child surrogate mother. We\nwill also analyze the characteristic decisions of the ECHR concerning\nsurrogacy, which may be a kind of roadmap for the Serbian legislator.\nIn the last chapter, researching the rules on adoption, we\nwill deal with its concept, historical development, functions, material\nand formal conditions for its establishment, types, effect and methods\nand consequences of its termination. As the Preliminary draft\nproposes a return to incomplete adoption, which was not so long ago\npresent in Serbian family law, we will also express our opinion on it.\nConsidering that the biggest differences between domestic and certain\nforeign laws are manifested in the sphere of the age difference\nbetween adopters and adoptees, we will deal with it in particular, in\norder to draw a conclusion about the one that best suits natural laws\nand modern needs. We will point out the importance of the best\ninterest of the child as a condition for establishing adoption, both in\ndomestic and comparative law, and in the practice of the ECHR.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».