MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7058599114

Nonhuman Animals in Margaret Atwood's Fictional Worlds

2024· dissertation· en· W7058599114 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueRepository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) · 2024
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueMagnetic confinement fusion research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésScholarshipRhetorical questionContext (archaeology)ForgettingObject (grammar)NarrativeField (mathematics)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

From the very origins of human civilization, nonhuman animals have been used as endless literary tools, in some cases as part of rhetorical figures, in others as substitutes of humans, or even as the object of discussion. Despite their prominence, what most narratives seem to lack is the voice of the actual nonhuman animals, oftentimes forgetting to give them the possibility of being individuals with their own biological and emotional interests and needs. This tendency has slightly changed amongst writers in the last decades due to the awareness raised by the critical field of Animal Studies and its resistance to see nonhuman animals as a collectivity that is deprived of language, reason, soul, or individuality. A writer who has acknowledged the potential that nonhuman animals have and frequently incorporates them in her oeuvre is the Canadian author, Margaret Atwood. She offers an engaging insight into how nonhuman animals are perceived within her Canadian context and has even challenged the common roles assigned to them in her extensive literary career. The ecological revindications and feminist elements that are integrated in her works make Atwood an author of considerable interest to study from new perspectives. Thus, this dissertation borrows from the most recent scholarship on (Critical) Animal Studies and Ecofeminism to address the analysis of how nonhuman animals are represented in Atwood’s novels and graphic novels. To do so, the corpus encompasses the seventeen novels that have been published by Margaret Atwood, ranging from the late sixties until the most recent one in 2019, and her two graphic novels. Additionally, I examine whether nonhuman animals are presented as sentient beings and if Atwood incorporates the theories from animal rights movements that surfaced in the seventies and have evolved into the discipline of ethics to the present day. Moreover, by placing the focus on the transversal role that nonhuman animals have within the novels published throughout seven decades, I analyze if an evolution can be appreciated in their treatment. Lastly, I investigate how she frames the animal question within the perspectives of gender and feminism given the importance that these themes have in Atwood’s literary works. Consequently, the analysis of Atwood’s novels and graphic novels is classified into six different categories regarding the representation of nonhuman animals. I begin by studying the construction of the Canadian identity of Atwood’s characters through the wildlife that surrounds them and their identification with nonhuman animals. Then, I analyze how nonhuman animals are framed into cultural beliefs and folklore, with a special focus on religion. Subsequently, I apply Carol J. Adam’s theory of the absent referent to examine the connections between the exploitation and silencing of women and nonhuman animals. Next, I explore the dominance and commodification in nonhuman animals’ death, which includes their employment in artistic creations or within the scientific community. Following this, I focus on how nonhuman animals are represented in Atwood’s dystopian narratives by incorporating concepts such as slow violence, rewilding, ustopia and zoopolitical citizens. Lastly, I draw on Josephine Donovan’s concept of aesthetics of care to examine the interspecies entanglements found between human and nonhuman animals.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,494
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,810

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,272 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRepository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia)Même sujetMagnetic confinement fusion researchTravaux en français237 207