MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7058715575

New measures taken for a better IJAV

2010· article· en· W7058715575 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueMagnetic confinement fusion research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGratitudeAccounts payableWork (physics)Editorial boardThursday
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dear Colleagues,We are pleased to have the third volume of International Journal of Anatomical Variations (IJAV) being published. During the 22 months period since the announcement of IJAV, we have published 99 case reports, 3 letters to the editor and 1 editorial. Those manuscripts have been submitted by colleagues from 17 different countries including Argentina, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, India, Jamaica, Malaysia, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Trinidad & Tobago, Turkey, United Kingdom, and USA. Currently, total page number of the three volumes is 240, and 56 manuscripts are under review. Web traffic of IJAV shows an increasing trend since the beginning, and now we already reached most of the world (Figure 1). In this connection, I’d like to express my heartiest gratitude to our colleagues for their interest in IJAV, and to the editorial and scientific advisory board members for their hard work during the meticulous reviewing process and maintenance of the journal.On the other hand, the increasingly high number of submissions brought some difficulties along. To properly handle the manuscripts on time, and manage IJAV in our way to be a leading journal, we have to adopt some measures. Due to increased costs of article management, publishing, and storage, we are forced to implement author fees. Because editor-in-chief and all editors work for free, we are able to keep the fees much below those charged by many other journals. Effective from April 17th, 2010, we will charge a publication fee for all accepted articles (US$ 150, payable before publishing). No submission fee will be charged upon submission. The publication fee will apply for the manuscripts submitted after April 17th, 2010. The authors will not be charged for the manuscripts that are not accepted for publication. A waiver will be granted for lower income countries, students, and authors experiencing financial hardship, upon contacting the editor-in-chief. This waiver procedure will be completely confidential between the author and the editor-in-chief. Two thirds of the publication fee will be paid to the reviewers of the manuscript, whereas one third will be used to finance the maintenance of the website, typesetting of the article, and management of the editorial office. To encourage our reviewers to provide a prompt review, we will pay them. Typically, a reviewer will receive US$ 50 for reviewing a manuscript. PayPal system will be used for the transfers between the author, editor and reviewers. The publication fee of IJAV is much below those charged by our competitors, which charge US$ 225 to US$ 1,500 per manuscript. Additionally, some journals charge a non-refundable submission fee (typically US$ 25 to US$ 200) or a fast-track fee (US$ 450; non-refundable, even if the paper is rejected, with or without peer-review) to get the initial decision within 15 working days, publication within one month after acceptance. We substantially publish the articles within one month after acceptance, free of additional charge.Open access publishing is a relatively new model that allows all the readers to view, download, print, and redistribute any article without a subscription. It enables far greater distribution of an author’s study than the traditional subscription-based publishing model. Many authors in a variety of fields have begun to realize the benefits that open access publishing can provide in terms of increasing the impact of their work. In the open access model, the author pays the publication costs of an article. This charge replaces subscription charges and allows all interested readers to freely access the full-text of every published article [1–5].As a second change that will be effective from April 17th, 2010, the number of the authors will be limited to four. This measure is adopted to prevent any possible scientific misconduct, since it is not likely to have more than 4 authors actually contributing to a case report.The details for charging the publication fee will be provided to the authors along with the letter of acceptance.Hoping to have an increasingly wide collaboration in the future too.Sincerely,Selcuk Tunali, MD, PhDEditor-in-Chief & Publisher, IJAV

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,021
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,052
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,038
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,126

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0210,052
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0040,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,004
Communication savante0,0120,016
Science ouverte0,0030,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,017
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0380,020

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,213
Tête enseignante GPT0,545
Écart entre enseignants0,331 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Même sujetMagnetic confinement fusion research→Travaux en français237 207→