Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
C ontention: crosswords are the shit.Acknowledgement: they might not seem to be.Rebuttal: if they don't "seem to be," you've either made a mistake or you haven't given them a chance or you're just kind of a drag.For those who don't yet get crosswords, though, this one's for you.And for those who do get crosswords, this one is for you as well.To get started, we have to dive into the crossword's contentious, feverish, one-hundred-percent-riveting past.To get meaningful, we have to surface to bathe in the glory of its present.We start in New York.Some patriotic Italians would have you believe their countryman, Giuseppe Airoldi, came up with the crossword concept pre-1900.They are liars.The first crossword was born on the morning of December 21st, 1913, to a writer for the New York World: one Arthur Wynne.Was this the crossword we know and love today?The one that drives the masses to take the free ad-riddled newspaper they'd otherwise leave moldering in its vandalized box?The one that's inspired films, books, and regrettable fashion statements?The one that gives us a brief respite from the tedium of what we've settled for?No.This is 1913, guys.They didn't even have TV.Google some pictures of a McDonald's menu from another country.That's how the first crosswords were: disconcertingly different.It wasn't even called a crossword-for all his smarts, Wynne settled on the far less tongue-delighting "Word-Cross Puzzle" as his game's title.Studious onomatologists will happily inform you that, owing to a type-setting error, the Word-Cross became the Cross-Word (a moment of accidental genius on par with the potato chip).After that, laziness kicked in and the term lost its majuscules, becoming known simply as the crossword.So yeah-the twentieth century is going through puberty and the New York World has just knocked the socks off its readership with the greatest innovation in newspapers since objectivity.People are clamoring for their fix, ink is flying absolutely everywhere, horses and buggies run amok as their drivers are otherwise occupied.The president of the Amateur Athletic Union complains that his athletes are too busy with puzzles to properly train.A Princeton professor tries to use them in place of a textbook.A Knoxville reverend forces his congregants to complete a sermon-related crossword puzzle before he'll even begin preaching.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle