Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Discusses practices of Foreign Service and supervisory function of Consuls General; realized from beginning of Foreign Service in 1914 that Foreign Service regulations were outmoded; at first post in Fort Erie, Canada, had little to do, and spent time studying regulations and changes which should be made; as mere novice, was not presumptious enough to make suggestions to Department; both Fort Erie and Curaçao, the second post, were one-man posts, and there was little opportunity to put into practice ideas which had been germinating; in Antwerp, as Consul General, Messersmith had a regular staff; he started practice of regular staff meetings, so that work of various officers was coordinated; again in Buenos Aires he started same practice and here had cooperation of Ambassador Robert Woods Bliss; also inspected other U.S. Consulates in Argentina and nearby countries; also carried many of the practices initiated into Consulate General where there were about 30 consulates to be inspected; was concerned over the profusion of Foreign Services - Commerce, Agriculture, Treasury, etc., each attaché, some of whom were not qualified, reporting to his own Department, thus causing confusion, duplication of activities, and sometimes conflicting reports; as matter of economy and efficiency it was recommended that all Foreign Services be consolidated under State Department; in 1937, was called back to Washington to help with reorganization; mentions specifically help given by Joseph Gray, Secretary to Secretary of State Hull, with full approval of Hull and President Roosevelt; reorganization eventually carried through, and U.S. State Department and Foreign Service became the most efficient in the world and had the highest morale; with the advent of Edward R. Stettinius noticed a decline in morale and efficiency; Stettinius may have been good business man, but he brought to Department complete lack of experience in work of the Department and lack of knowledge of Foreign Service; he also brought in men equally inexperienced in conduct of foreign relations; hopes Department, under [John] Foster Dulles will regain its former efficiency.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».