MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7060917799

O cuidado familiar à pessoa idosa com transtorno mental: Modelo Calgary de avaliação da família

2020· dissertation· pt· W7060917799 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languept
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueMagnetic Field Sensors Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGenogramData collectionPresentation (obstetrics)Qualitative researchElderly peopleParticipant observationQualitative analysis
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Descriptive-exploratory research with a qualitative approach in order to analyze family care provided to elderly people with mental disorders. The study was carried out in one of the nine regional offices in the city of Belo Horizonte, with 326 elderly participants attended at CERSAM, between July 2017 and June 2019, and seven relatives of three of those elderly people who were being treated at the service. Data collection took place in three stages: document analysis on physical records, for data collection at CERSAM, with subsequent drawing carried out among the elderly undergoing treatment, followed by document analysis on the municipality's Health Management Information System and, for Finally, semi-structured interviews with family members, at home. To organize the data collected during document analysis, Excel tables and the digitization of some documents were used by the CamScanner application. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded. The analysis steps proposed by Yin (2005) followed, of examining, categorizing and recombining the evidence to address the study's propositions. It should be noted that the Calgary Family Assessment Model (MCAF) was used as a theoretical-methodological framework for the study, from the elaboration of the interview script to the case analysis, using the graphic representations of genogram and ecomap in the presentation of the results. Ethical precepts were respected and the names described in the work are fictitious. The results were presented in five chapters, including the characterization of the 326 elderly people attended at CERSAM, 63,2% of whom were female, with an average age of 68,06, aged between 60 and 94 years old, with a predominance of the 60 to 69 years in 65,64%. As for education, 43,75% had between one and four years of study, 45,3% were married, 46,11% were housewives and 35% retired, and 32,82% had long-term follow-up at CERSAM. The three cases had similarities in the family configuration: two were extended families and one consanguineous, with great influence of siblings in the care. The diagnoses of mental disorder occurred after the age of thirty, in the cases of Rosa and Lorenzo, and before the age of 25, in the case of Alvarez. The prevalence of diagnoses of mental disorders in other family members in the three cases is emphasized, all of them being brothers of the elderly. The three were young elderly and only Rosa had other chronic pathologies that triggered dependency, although their dependence was related to instability associated with mental disorder. This fact, which together with the family's lack of preparation and knowledge about the disease, worsened the burden and prevalence of negative bonds in the family of this elderly woman. For family care for the elderly with a mental disorder, there were needs to adapt the family, with stability, organization and dedication to know the disease and the elderly themselves. There was also a lack of support for health and social services in the care of the elderly with mental disorders and their families. It is expected that this study will contribute to the knowledge about the care of family members to this public, and to mobilize the State through policies and services of continuous care. Also, to direct the actions of health professionals, especially nurses, with the use of the MCAF, for planning interventions, guidelines and preparing a care plan for the elderly and family caregivers.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,863
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,249
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Même sujetMagnetic Field Sensors TechniquesTravaux en français237 207