MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7061229379

Petrological analyses and Lu-Hf geochronology of subducted continental and oceanic crust from different locations in the upper and lower plate of the Caledonian Orogen

2020· dissertation· en· W7061229379 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

Revuebonndoc (University of Bonn) · 2020
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEclogiteMetamorphismIsochronGeochronologyOceanic crustSubduction
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In this thesis I conducted Lu-Hf analyses on samples from locations all over the Caledonian Orogen. I combined these ages with petrological analyses in order to help to unravel some of the open questions concerning the development of the Caledonian continental collision.<br /> I dated three meta-mafic / meta-ultramafic samples from the Northeast Greenland Eclogite Province but only one of the eclogites gave a precise isochron age of 357.8 ± 1.7 Ma. I interpret this age as dating a point shortly after the pressure-peak. This sample shows textural evidence of UHP metamorphism, which is in accordance with a c. 360 Ma age from another UHP rock from further northeast. The other eclogite and the ultramafic sample experienced probably only HP metamorphism and yielded errorchrons which are caused by a scatter of the garnet separates due to protracted garnet growth and partial re-equilibration of garnets during high temperature at peak-pressure conditions. Nevertheless, a geological meaningful age of c. 400 Ma age can be estimated for high-pressure metamorphism of those samples which is in accordance with previous dating for HP rocks from the Northeast Greenland Eclogite province. These results support the idea that UHP metamorphism in the Northeast Greenland Eclogite Province is c. 360 Ma, while HP metamorphism is c. 400 Ma. In addition this study showed that UHP metamorphism is not restricted to the Eastern Block of the Northeast Greenland Eclogite Province, but also occurs in the Central Block. The two main problems when explaining these ages is that the Northeast Greenland Eclogite Province is interpreted to be the Laurentian continental margin (i.e. upper plate) and that UHP metamorphism occurred after the main collisional phase between Baltica and Laurentia. Based on my analyses I support a tectonic model in which HP metamorphism at 400 Ma was caused by crustal thickening during collision between Baltica and Laurentia and UHP metamorphism at c. 360 Ma was caused by intra-continental subduction within<br /> Laurentia. <br /> I analyzed an eclogite and a blueschist from the Vestgötabreen Complex in western Svalbard. For the blueschist I obtained an age of 459.3 ± 5.4 Ma, which I interpret as a HP garnet-growth-related age. The garnets in the eclogite show a more complex metamorphic history. They show two growth phases with a discrete jump in composition between core and rim. Lu-Hf geochronology gave an errorchron of 466.3 ± 5.6 Ma which I interpret as a mixed age between core and rim that is biased towards the rim age. The core probably grew during early prograde metamorphism, while the rim grew during blueschist-facies metamorphism after c. 458 Ma, which is the youngest age obtained from the eclogite with Lu-Hf geochronology. This age fit into a model, where the Richarddalen Complex and Berzeliuseggene Unit belong to a continent together with the Pearya Terrane which is now found on Ellesmere Island in the Canadian Arctic and the Vestgötabreen Complex together with Nordenskiöld Land would be part of the Iapetus Ocean that was subducted before the collision. This could have happened either north of Laurentia or (not including the Perya Terrane) further south in connection with the Taconian/Grampian Arc.<br /> The main part of this thesis is devoted to rocks of the Seve Nappe Complex in Scandinavia, which is thought to be part of the outer margin of the Baltican continent. I dated rock from Norrbotten, Jämtland and the Lindas Nappe. The former two indisputably belong to the Seve Nappe Complex, while the affiliation of the Lindas nappe is still controversial. High-pressure rocks in the main part of the Seve Nappe Complex occur in the Tsäkokk Lens (Norrbotten), the Vaimok Lens (Norrbotten), Northern Jämtland and Central Jämtland (from north to south). They are dated at c. 484-487 Ma, c. 480 Ma, c. 460 Ma, and c. 445-450 Ma, respectively. The conditions in the subduction zone did not change during that time interval, as peak PT conditions from all locations fall on a geotherm of 7-9 °C/km. This subduction took place before the main collision of Baltica and Laurentia and was probably related to the collision of Baltica with an island arc. As the ages seem to get progressively younger from north to south, the arc-contintent collision probably slowly migrated south by 9-13 km/Ma. More high precision dating of rocks from locations between Norrbotten and Jämtland is needed to further verify this idea. The role of the Lindas Nappe in this tectonic scenario is still unresolved.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,114
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,431

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle