The role of common genetic variation in model polygenic and monogenic traits
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The aim of this thesis is to explore the role of common genetic variation, identified through genome-wide association (GWA) studies, in human traits and diseases, using height as a model polygenic trait, type 2 diabetes as a model common polygenic disease, and maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) as a model monogenic disease. \nThe wave of the initial GWA studies, such as the Wellcome Trust Case-Control Consortium (WTCCC) study of seven common diseases, substantially increased the number of common variants associated with a range of different multifactorial traits and diseases. The initial excitement, however, seems to have been followed by some disappointment that the identified variants explain a relatively small proportion of the genetic variance of the studied trait, and that only few large effect or causal variants have been identified. Inevitably, this has led to criticism of the GWA studies, mainly that the findings are of limited clinical, or indeed scientific, benefit. \nUsing height as a model, Chapter 2 explores the utility of GWA studies in terms of identifying regions that contain relevant genes, and in answering some general questions about the genetic architecture of highly polygenic traits. \nChapter 3 takes this further into a large collaborative study and the largest sample size in a GWA study to date, mainly focusing on demonstrating the biological relevance of the identified variants, even when a large number of associated regions throughout the genome is implicated by these associations. Furthermore, it shows examples of different features of the genetic architecture, such as allelic heterogeneity and pleiotropy. \nChapter 4 looks at the predictive value and, therefore, clinical utility, of variants found to associate with type 2 diabetes, a common multifactorial disease that is increasing in prevalence despite known environmental risk factors. This is a disease where knowledge of the genetic risk has potentially substantial clinical relevance. \nFinally, Chapter 5 approaches the monogenic-polygenic disease bridge in the direction opposite to that approached in the past: most studies have investigated genes mutated in monogenic diseases as candidates for harboring common variants predisposing to related polygenic diseases. This chapter looks at the common type 2 diabetes variants as modifiers of disease onset in patients with a monogenic but clinically heterogeneous disease, maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».