Physical, Psychosocial, and Practical Burden of Patients Receiving Care for Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Canada: A Mixed-Methods Qualitative Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Pradeepa Yoganathan,1– 3 Bernard Hurley,4 Andrew Merkur,5 Chad Andrews,6 Jennifer A Pereira,7 Larissa S Moniz8 1Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto School of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Visual & Anatomical Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA; 3Windsor Eye Associates, Windsor, ON, Canada; 4University of Ottawa Eye Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; 5Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 6College of Optometrists of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada; 7JRL Research & Consulting Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada; 8Fighting Blindness Canada, Toronto, ON, CanadaCorrespondence: Larissa S Moniz, Fighting Blindness Canada, 12th Floor, 890 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3P4, Canada, Tel +1-416-360-4200, Email lmoniz@fightingblindness.caPurpose: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of irreversible vision loss. Documentation of the disease’s description and treatment experience of Canadian patients is limited but of interest given the aging population and resultant implications for healthcare systems. A mixed-methods study was conducted to understand the challenges experienced by patients living in Canada with AMD to identify areas of need and for potential reform.Patients and Methods: Canadian residents with wet or dry AMD were eligible for participation in an online survey and one-on-one telephone interview regarding their disease experience. Participants were recruited via a not-for-profit stakeholder organization and an ophthalmology clinic. Surveys were completed from January–June 2020 and interviews were conducted from November–December 2020, with findings reported using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis, respectively.Results: Findings from 303 survey responses and 20 interviews were analyzed. Most participants indicated their vision loss negatively impacts their ability to conduct daily activities (eg, self care, driving) and leads to constant worry, loneliness, and/or isolation. Participants frequently reported requiring caregiver support, often for eye appointment travel or everyday tasks. Regardless of AMD type, participants reported having several appointments each year, and that time spent travelling to/from and waiting at appointments and related costs were considerable. Although participants receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections valued treatment, the experience added additional burden related to anxiety, fear, pain, and even greater reliance on caregivers. Many participants indicated they felt poorly informed about their disease and treatment options, particularly at diagnosis, which increased their emotional burden.Conclusion: Patients with AMD living in Canada experience a significant and persistent mental, physical, and financial burden as a direct result of their disease. Improvements to provision of disease-related information, support of daily activities and appointment attendance, and the overall treatment experience could substantially enhance outcomes among the growing population of patients with AMD.Keywords: age-related macular degeneration, Canada, burden of illness, disease experience, survey, interview
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,017 | 0,029 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».