Reading the signs in the Whitefeather Forest cultural landscape, northwestern Ontario
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
s boreal forest, natural resources planning, management and governance are increasingly becoming shared amongst different cultural groups.Criteria and lndicators (C&l) have become a leading tool for assessing sustainability, for guiding natural resources management planning and decision-making, and for monitoring ecological change.However, there are few examples of 1) the processes by which a shared understanding of lndigenous C&|, grounded in local knowledge, values and institutions can be developed, and2) what a local-levelAboriginal C&l framework, grounded in local values and institutions, would look like.This research, undertaken collaboratively with Pikangikum First Nation (PFN) and the Whitefeather Forest Management Corporation (WFMC), attempts to address these knowledge gaps through the following objectives:1. Develop an understanding of Pikangikum values for Keeping the Land, and the institutions through which they are fostered and actualized (i.e.Ahneesheenahbay ways of knowing, practices and beliefs).2. Cooperatively develop a framework to both articulate and communicate the values, knowledge and institutions for Keeping the Land.3. Develop an understanding of how these values represent criteria for Keeping the Land, how Pikangikum people perceive these signs (i.e.indicators) of social-ecological variability in the Whitefeather Forest, and how these sgns contribute to: a. Monitoring, responding and adapting to change, and b.Maintaining the values, knowledge and institutions for Keeping the Land.Methods for this undertaking included review of narratives gathered throughout the Whitefeather Forest community-based land use planning process as well as collaborative workshops with community lders.Approached from a cooperative learning perspective, the research was participatory and iterative in nature.This approach allowed for the co-production of a holistic cultural landscape framework and the development of shared understandings of the values and institutions for Keeping the Land.Keeping the Land must begin with Ohneesheesheen, to have good mental, spiritual, physical, emotional health, and practice activities properly on the land to create well- being in yourself and in your actions.To be able to create Cheemeenooweecheeteeyaung, to build good relationships with family, community, and the Creator and to form partnerships with people from other cultures, everything must be good.These relationships, in turn, are what make Oohnuhcheekayween possible (i.e.planning for the future, and making decisions for the community that will have positive social, economic, and environmental outcomes).This planning and decision-making will ensure that Ailneesheenahbayweepeemahteeseeween, the Pikangikum way of life, will continue as it should and that the land will continue to be kept.As criteria are values, and indicators arise from values (Meadows 1998), the cultural landscape framework was also developed into a local-level approach to monitoring Keeping the Land.Pikangikum's approach to criteria and indicators (C&ls) are based on held values embedded in Ahneesheenahbay worldview, beliefs, and rules of proper conduct with the land.This study presents an example of a place-based learning community, where collaborative learning resulted in the co-production of new knowledge.This knowledge is based on a shared understanding of Pikangikum values and institutions for Keeping the Land, and as such can contribute to building a new approach to Natural Resources and Environmental Management (NREM).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».