The quality of the educational environment relating to emergent literacy practices: links to children’s engagement in preschool and kindergarten
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The main objective of this study is to examine the relationships between the quality of the educational environment and the child's engagement in developmental and learning situations relating to emergent literacy in preschool and kindergarten classes in Québec (Canada). Oral language, reading, and writing are generally considered to be interrelated processes that correspond to emergent literacy in children ages 0 to 6 (Morrow et al., 2019). Through quality educational practices, the educational environment of the classroom supports the child's engagement in emergent literacy development and learning situations (Baroody & Diamond, 2016). The educational environment includes the physical dimension (classroom layout, resources, books, writing materials) as well as the interactive dimension (teacher and child interactions) (Guo et al., 2012). Child engagement refers to interactions with the teacher, peers and his or her involvement within tasks and activities (Bohlmann et al., 2019; Downer et al., 2010). \n \nThe quality of these interactions plays an essential role in the development of 4 and 5-year-olds' emergent literacy and in their current and later educational success (Sabol et al., 2018). As part of the \nimplementation of the new integrated preschool and kindergarten educational program in Québec (MEQ, 2021), it is important to develop knowledge regarding the quality of the educational environment and the child's interactions within this environment considering the importance of language \ndevelopment in preventing later reading and writing difficulties. This research project has 3 objectives: \n \n1) To measure the quality of the physical environment and the interactive environment relating to emergent literacy in preschool and kindergarten classrooms; 2) To measure children's level of engagement in their emergent literacy development and learning situations; 3) To analyze the \nrelationships between the quality of the educational environment relating to emergent literacy and children's level of engagement in these emergent literacy development and learning situations. \n \nThe sample will consist of 30 preschool and kindergarten teachers and children in their class (N=150). The classroom observations will allow us to assess the overall educational environment supporting emergent \nliteracy using the ELLCO Pre-K observation tool (Smith et al., 2008). On the other hand, the inCLASS observation tool (Downer et al., 2010) will measure children's level of engagement with the teacher, peers and tasks in emergent literacy development and learning situations. The results will contribute to a better understanding of the relationships between the quality of the educational environment (physical and interactive) and children's engagement in their emergent literacy experiences. This new \nknowledge will support research-based educational practices that promote children's educational success (MEES, 2018). In addition, the results can be incorporated into pre-service and in-service teacher training as the new preschool and kindergarten curriculum is implemented.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».