Review of <i>Hidden in Plain Sight: Contributions of Aboriginal\nPeoples to Canadian Identity and Culture, Volume l</i> Edited by David R. Newhouse, Cora J. Voyageur,\nand Dan Beavon
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Hidden in Plain Sight is a book with an unusual agenda: to discuss and publicize the many constructive, meaningful contributions that Aboriginal peoples have made to Canadian society. Aimed primarily at the general public, students, and Aboriginal people themselves, the book contains essays from treaty researchers, civil servants, lawyers, teachers, curators, artists, writers, undergraduate students, and academics. The book's impetus arose from its editors' frustration over the constant equation of Aboriginal people with pain, problems, and struggle. Widely absent from public discourse and academic writing, they felt, was attention to the strengths and capacity of Aboriginal peoples, their achievements in many fields of endeavor, and the signs of positive developments in recent years. As David Newhouse explains in his preface, the editors hoped to "add a new dimension to the picture of Aboriginal peoples, one that shows them to be industrious, meritorious, and accomplished," and by so doing to "help create a place of respect and dignity for Aboriginal peoples in Canada."\nThe body of the book is divided into seven sections of varying lengths: "Treaties," "Arts and Media," "Literature," "Justice," "Culture and Identity," "Sports," and "Military." With three of the largest sections concentrating on arts and culture, this area receives by far the greatest attention, constituting over half of the volume's forty-seven items. Scattered throughout the book are twenty-four short biographical profiles, most of them produced by the undergraduate students in editor Cora Voyageur's sociology class. While these are not always elegant pieces of writing, they are an interesting element and directly showcase Aboriginal talent, creativity, and industry.\nIn tone, content, style, and overall quality, this collection is, predictably, mixed. The articles also vary in their overall intent: some are clearly designed to provide overviews of an issue for the general public; others appear to be aimed more at an academic audience.· There is little content specifically on the Great Plains; rather, most articles attempt to cover most or all of Canada. Some individuals from the Great Plains are profiled, including academic and activist Harold Cardinal, artist Allen Sapp, linguist Freda Ahenakew, and architect Douglas Cardinal.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».