The Second International Workshop on Enterprise Security
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Welcome to our second international workshop on Enterprise Security as part of CloudCom 2015, Vancouver, Canada, November 30-December 3, 2015. The first international workshop held in Singapore has been a major success since then we have achieved greater team activities, research, and international collaborations as the major and significant outcome of our first workshop on this topic. Enterprise Security involves all business, products, governments, organization, and their contractors. This also includes research areas of information security, software security, computer security, cloud security, IoT security, data and big data security. This workshop provides a significant contribution from experts on some of the following key research areas: * Incident response Systems Security - This involves many organisations are outsourcing computer operations to third parties, and the next logical step is to outsource management of computer security incidents as well. * Cloud Security Assurance Model - Defining proper measures for evaluating the effectiveness of an assurance model, which we have developed to ensure cloud security, is vital to ensure the successful implementation and continued running of the model. We need to understand that with security being such an essential component of business processes, responsibility must lie with the board. * Cloud Security - The development of cloud computing and the vast use of its services poses significant security and privacy concerns to the people and the organizations relying on these services. Diversification and obfuscation approaches are of the most promising proactive techniques that protect computers from harmful malware, by preventing them to take advantage of the security vulnerabilities. Mission critical applications are limited in the cloud as it has various security issues. As the data size are being increased gradually and the difficulty in storing, retrieving and managing data makes the application to move into cloud. * Cloud Forensics & Cryptanalysis and Enhancement - Password based authentication has been used extensively as a one of the most appropriate authentication techniques. * Validating technology and BI Techniques – This is useful for organizations to understand their status with return and risk. They can evaluate their security policies and technologies regularly. * Risk Analysis and Big Data – This is increasingly important for organizations since they deal with growing amount of data, dependency and complexity. Risk analysis can be applied to many areas related or outside cloud computing. We are pleased to receive 24 papers from researchers of 12 different countries. After the vigorous review process and careful considerations, 11 papers have been selected, with 5 full papers and 6 short papers. We have offered two prize awards. One award is to award the best paper in the information system category. The other award is to award the best paper in the computational category. Each winner can be invited to International Journal of Information Management (IJIM) and Future Generation Computer Systems (FGCS). Another good news we have is that extended version of conference papers and other security/risk researchers can contribute to our Springer book scheduled to call for papers after our workshop. We are honoured to have Dr. Konstantin Beznosov to be our keynote speaker. Enterprise Security has been a popular topic since it includes cyber security, risk management, information security, Cloud and Forensic security, risk analysis and Big Data. It is an area that can make theory into practice and allow any organizations that adopt our recommendations to enjoy the benefits of enforced Enterprise Security. The outputs of our workshop can provide organizations with several useful recommendations, proofs-of-concepts and demonstrations to improve current security and risk practices. We hope the second international workshop will foster collaborations of projects, research publications and funding opportunities at the international setting in Vancouver, Canada. Workshop Organizing Committee would like to thank CloudCom organizers for their fullest support.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,133 | 0,063 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».