Registrar’s Advisory Committee Minutes: August 1, 2022
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Announcements: Jennifer Koontz made an announcement to the group on behalf of Standing Committee on Student Policies and Communication (a part of the Student Support Advisory Committee) regarding an upcoming discussion at RAC in the fall.For the past several months, representatives from all the undergraduate colleges have been participating in a discussion of a variety of policies, their interpretation by the colleges, and both intended and unintended consequences for colleges and students.The discussion has focused on proposing language that is meant to enforce or reinforce current policies and practices, supporting both students and staff.Future discussions at RAC and when proposed language is forwarded to SCEP will clarify when the suggested change is to actual policy language or procedures.The majority of this conversation has been about issues with the probation/suspension policy.The group has been looking for consistencies and inconsistencies and recommending language changes (that would eventually be brought to SCEP for discussion and approval), where appropriate, to accommodate differences.Some of the specific points the group has discussed are: allowing students returning from suspension to apply to a different college from the suspending college; having CAPE or the transition center get involved when appropriate; adding some language to the policy to the effect of, "students on probation should not take more than 15 credits.Colleges can recommend fewer or greater credit loads."Also, if this advice is ignored, that can be taken into consideration by the college; adding language that stipulates that students must take academic courses, though this is hard to clarify; finally, the group is proposing to add language that outlines the use of summer enrollment.Specifically, that students who are suspension eligible only be allowed to take summer classes if it's mathematically possible for them to have a positive impact on the suspension decision (this has been in place for several years, but there is currently no policy language to back up this process).Jennifer reiterated that there will be a more detailed discussion of the sub-committee's work at the September -or later -RAC meeting.The committee is still very much in the process of discussing these issues, and welcomes feedback.Kasi Williamson announced that the grades and transcripts section of the One Stop Web site is getting a facelift
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».