Social representations theory in North America, Oceania, Asia and Africa
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The present paper is included within a wider research program launched by de Rosa in 1994, aimed at performing the meta-theoretical analysis of the scientific literature published on Social Representations Theory (SRT), and representing the unified framework of the EC-funded project (ITN-People MSCA-IDP 2013, no. 6072799, http://www.europhd.eu/SoReComJointIDP) and explores the state of the art of the Social Representations Theory (SRT) in the geo-cultural contexts of North America (Canada and the United States of America - USA), Australia and New Zealand, Asia and Africa, spatially and temporally, as well as from a conceptual, disciplinary, theoretical, empirical and thematic point of view. For all four geo-cultural papers, the Grid for Meta-Theoretical Analysis was applied on publications extracted from the So.Re.Com “A.S. de Rosa” @-library and meta-theoretically analyzed. The size of the samples was: 395 for North America, 107 for Australia and New Zealand, 194 for Asia and, respectively, 103 for Africa. The findings of the meta-theoretical analysis were then explored based on absolute and relative frequencies, lexicometrically (Hierarchical Descending Classification) and through clustering algorithms (Hierarchical Clustering on Principal Components analysis). Results for North America revealed that SRT was employed differently in Canada as compared to the USA, in the sense that while used empirically to study objects of high social relevance in both countries, there seems to be a distinct trend of reconceptualization and reformulation of SRT in the USA that we did not find in Canada. All in all, SRT appears to have been adopted in this area due to its applicability in studying a wide range of social phenomena, thus being pragmatically useful in obtaining information about lay knowledge. However, the low penetration rate of SRT in the USA may be indeed due to its epistemological and methodological traditions (socio-constructionism and qualitative research), incompatible with the existent publishing tradition in the USA, which favors individualistic approaches to social phenomena as well as quantitative research. For Australia and New Zealand, our findings revealed that SRT has most likely permeated this geo-cultural area in the context of Social Psychology, which was highly developed along the lines of Social Cognition and Social Identity Theories, influences which we found in the scientific production on SRT as well, especially around the time when SRT was first adopted here. More recently, the attempts at integrating SRT within mainstream social psychology seem to have declined. Thematically, SRT has been mainly employed in studying identity issues and objects of high social interest for this context. We also found differences between Australia and New Zealand in terms of their preference for employing qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Our findings support the originality of the SRT contributions from this geo-cultural area, both in terms of theoretical as well as empirical advancement of SRT. For the Asian geo-cultural context, our results revealed that SRT was adopted by Asian social psychologists due to its epistemological and empirical compatibilities with their purpose of creating an original Asian social psychology, interested in indigenous social phenomena specific to their cultures (Liu & Ng, 2007). Thus, our findings show a vast array of diverse social objects for which empirical research with SRT was conducted, in line with both the cultural background and the societal interests in the region. All in all, the development of SRT in Asia seems to be linked to the desire to construct an indigenous social psychology, which supports the versatility of the theory in studying lay knowledge and social phenomena of high interest across a wide range of contexts. Finally, for the African geo-cultural context, our results revealed that SRT was adopted by social psychologists due to its epistemological and methodological compatibilities with the demands of this geo-cultural area, namely for a conceptual framework that is apt to capture social phenomena in context, free from the bias of having been tailored on Western populations and thus carrying implicit assumptions not pertinent to this area. Our findings also reveal that SRT was applied in accordance with its original premises, especially the trans-disciplinary ones, and that it fulfills its critical potential of addressing issues having to do with social oppression and inequality (Howarth, 2006), specific to this area.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,016 | 0,028 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,016 | 0,020 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».