Serving the Right Plate: Spatial Biases in Food Plating Aesthetics
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
With the growing popularity of social media, the aesthetics of food plating is getting more and more exposure. Optimizing the aesthetics of plating and understanding where certain elements of the dish should be placed on a plate or within a bento box or bowl will aid researchers in learning what side of dishware plating creates the most appetizing appearance to the average diner. The goal is to understand the ideal layout of a dish in order to improve a chef’s plating techniques along with optimal advertising photography for a world focused on visual stimuli. \nPrevious literature led us to predict that there would be a leftward bias of plating the largest, most caloric heavy component of the meal on the dish. Similar to Western text (both reading and writing) moving from left-to-right, we suspect diners prefer food being placed in a similar directionality. Art is commonly studied in conjunction with laterality experiments, where participants frequently demonstrate a leftward bias. Japanese bentos are normally rectangular in shape, akin to a portrait or painting. When scanning a photograph, people generally scan from left-to-right similar to when reading text. Research in laterality suggests that native reading direction can highly influence a person’s opinion on aesthetics. \n This thesis outlines studies of food plating aesthetics whereby Canadian participants were presented photographs of professionally plated dishes and their mirror image together to elicit and record preferences. Image pairs were presented on top of each other in random orders, and decisions between leftward and rightward biased choices were collected and analysed. The majority of participants had a native reading direction of left-to-right. \nInterpretations of the results suggested what the ideal way to plate food is. For food presented on plates, no significant placement bias was present overall. However, for bento boxes and poke bowls, participants preferred dishes where the majority of the food was plated on the left side of the dishware, resulting in a statistically significant leftward bias. Additionally, a particular favourable trend was consistently seen, where participants almost always preferred a placement of long foods to start at the bottom left corner and ascend towards the top right in a diagonal pattern. \nResearch in laterality and aesthetics suggests that people have a particular penchant towards either specifically the left or right side for many different habits (such as preparing the right hand for a handshake) or appearances (such as preferring artwork that is illuminated from the left). By applying these studied concepts to the art of plating, techniques can be taught to create ideal presentations. Learning how we can optimize plating aesthetics can benefit people in a variety of vocations. Mainly chefs, cooks, photographers, social media users, advertisers, and marketers could use this conclusion of a leftward bias preference to their advantage.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,210 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».