The Regulation of Armed Non-State Actors: Promoting the Application of the \nLaws of War to Conflicts Involving National Liberation Movements
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The regulation of armed non-state actors is a challenge \nto the state-centric international law paradigm. The vast \nmajority of international legal instruments which impact \nthe regulation of armed actors are open to ratification by states \nonly. This leads to the unfortunate situation in which armed nonstate \nactors often fall outside the remit of international law and \ntheir use of force and, indeed, the use of force against them, is \nleft unregulated, which can only be to the detriment of combatants \nand civilians alike. However, there is an emerging trend, \nled by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) \nand non-governmental organizations (NGOs) such as Geneva \nCall, to accommodate non-state actors under the international \nhumanitarian law (IHL) framework. \nThis article seeks to investigate how non-state actors, specifically \nnational liberation movements, are and could be regulated \nby IHL. It seeks to give an overview of the relevant legal provisions \nand illustrates the difficulties faced by national liberation \nmovements if they do wish to accede to IHL instruments and \napply IHL in their conflicts. As it is the aim of IHL to protect \nboth combatants and civilians in armed conflicts, it is important \nthat this body of law is practically applied and implemented in \nall conflict situations to the greatest extent possible. However, \nin the past, national liberation movements have encountered \ndifficulties when seeking to apply IHL to their conflicts due \nto the nature of the legal framework and, indeed, the nature of \ninternational law itself. \nInternational law, the body of law that governs states in their \nrelationships with one another, generally struggles to accommodate \nnon-state actors. The international legal instruments \ndealing with the laws of war, namely the Geneva Conventions \nof 1949,1 the Hague Regulations of 1907,2 and more modern \ninternational conventions seeking to regulate weapons such as \nthe Ottawa Treaty of 1997 banning landmines,3 were all drafted \nby states with the regulation of states in mind. These instruments \nalmost exclusively limit ratification to states and do not allow \nfor the accession of non-states. This means that non-state actors, \nincluding national liberation movements, face many difficulties \nwhen seeking to be bound by and apply IHL provisions in their \nconflicts, thus limiting the protection available to those fighting \nand caught up in these conflicts. However, non-state actors are \nactive in various theatres of war and it is therefore vital that a \nrealistic IHL framework that accommodates non-state actors be \nformulated.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».