Scale up of Participatory Planning for Resource Governance: A Case in Sam Chuon Lagoon, Vietnam
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
"In responding to the overexploitation and degradation of the rich natural resource base in the Tam Giang Lagoon in Vietnam, IDRC (Canada) provided support to participatory research to investigate problems and community-based management. Local farmers, fishers, and government officials joined with the research team in a series of collaborative learning and testing interventions over a period of several years. This led to a pilot implementation of a new model for participatory planning and resource co-management in the lagoon. This not only helped resolve conflicts and ensure a more equitable access to the resources, but also improved the prospects for better governance of lagoon resources in the future. Key to this achievement was a common understanding of the Community-Based Natural Resource Management approach developed among the stakeholders. The essential elements included full engagement of local stakeholders (with emphasis upon marginalized groups), recognition of customary access rights, changes to the processes of local planning and resource governance, and changes to the organization and roles of the key stakeholders. The research team also adopted a new role as facilitators of learning, capacity-building, and more importantly, negotiation and consensus building among the stakeholders. New locally-organized user groups along with leaders of local government played a central role in empowering the community, providing legal support, and organizing the implementation of joint plans. The officers of provincial and district government departments adopted a new role: they provided technical assistance instead of giving direct instructions. Fishers and farmers participated in lagoon planning based on their improved understandings of problems, benefits, and responsibilities, which grew from their ongoing involvement in the research. The challenge of the on going research activity is to identify the process and means for the scale up of the application of the participatory planning with respect to ecosystem base and multiple community involvement. The participatory planning was replicated successfully in Quang Loi lagoon, that had similar context of Quang Thai. It is also being carried out and further developed in Sam Chuon, a lagoon located in the middle of the larger lagoon system with four communes surrounding. The activities in supporting the participatory planning scale up include (1) building community movements for enlarging common lagoon areas and reorganizing exploitation based on livelihood problem solving; (2) supporting community capacity building through strengthening of the Fishing Union newly established; and (3) improving local livelihoods with participatory technology development for pen-culture. This paper introduces the participatory planning process and how its application is scaled up for larger effects in supporting community based resource management and local governance in the Tam Giang lagoon."
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,012 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,014 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».