MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7062069355

Septic arthritis in western Canadian feedlot cattle: a comparison of antimicrobial treatment options and a description of the bacterial communities present in infected joints

2024· dissertation· en· W7062069355 sur OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2024
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
Mots-clésSeptic arthritisAntibioticsPopulationSynovial fluidFeedlotBovine respiratory diseaseAntimicrobialArthritis
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Septic arthritis (SA) presents health, welfare, and production concerns in western Canadian feedlots. Septic arthritis has the highest case fatality rate of lameness causes and little information exists on treatment options. Mycoplasmopsis bovis is often the primary etiological agent of SA in feedlot cattle and H. somni has also been implicated. Furthermore, animals with SA often have concurrent chronic pneumonia. As a result, SA treatment protocols commonly recommend parenteral administration of antibiotics that have label claims for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) but with little efficacy information available for treatment of SA. The objectives of this two-year investigation were to 1) compare the health outcomes of three commonly administered antibiotics for the treatment of SA and 2) determine the microbiota of synovial fluid collected from SA joints. The treatment study consisted of trained pen riders identifying SA cases from the fall-placed calf population over a two-year period at four commercial feedlots. Cases were randomly allocated to three antibiotic treatments: florfenicol (FFN), oxytetracycline (OXY), and tulathromycin (TUL). The health outcomes monitored to 90 d post allocation included SA relapse treatments (first and second), BRD treatment, infectious mortality (BRD, H. somni, SA), and SA only mortality. Additional outcomes were early shipment for salvage slaughter (railer) and the sum of infectious mortality events and railer events (total fall out). In order to describe the microbiota of synovial fluid from SA cases, synovial fluid samples (n = 137) were collected over the same two-year period in the fall placed calf population at 11 commercial feedlots. The samples were collected via arthrocentesis from joints with and without SA and from antemortem and postmortem specimens. After collection, the samples were frozen at -20°C and then -80°C until DNA extraction process was completed. Samples underwent 16S rRNA gene sequencing using an Illumina platform and analysed using DADA2, QIIME2R, and the R-package. Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were based on 99% similarity and taxonomy was assigned using the SILVA reference database. Samples with less than 20,000 reads were omitted from the final analysis. In total, 251 eligible cases were allocated to the treatment comparison and no differences (P > 0.05) were noted for the morbidity outcomes of first and second SA relapse and BRD. Likewise, no differences (P > 0.05) were noted in the mortality outcomes, railer events, or total fallout. Time to event analysis was conducted with no differences (P > 0.05) noted for any of the health outcomes. From the original 137 synovial fluid samples, 66 met technical criteria to be included in the final analysis. Mycoplasmatota accounted for 96.6% of the phyla abundance and Mycoplasmopsis accounted for 94.8% of the abundance at the genus level. Samples from SA cases were noted to have a higher abundance of Mycoplasmopsis (P=0.033) and a lower Shannon diversity index compared to controls (P=0.018). Postmortem samples had a higher abundance of Mycoplasmopsis (P = 0.015) and a lower Shannon diversity index than antemortem samples (P = 0.001). Only 8.5% of the ASVs assigned to Mycoplasmopsis were assigned to the species level with M. alkalescens and M. wenyonii present in 10 and 2 samples, respectively. Histophilus did not rank in the top 15 genera found and the Pasteurellaceae family (of which Histophilus belongs) only accounted for 1% of ASV assignments. The lack of differences in health outcomes by treatment indicate that there is no economic advantage to using a particular treatment; the most cost effective product would be the least expensive to purchase. A study limitation was the lack of production performance data, which may have revealed differences by treatment. The lack of difference observed in the three antimicrobial products also introduces a question of antimicrobial efficacy for SA, it is possible that the products were equally ineffective. Conclusions from the microbiota study of joints with SA in the western Canadian feedlots are that Mycoplasmopsis is the predominant genera. Also of interest was that Histophilus was not found in the top 15 genera from the samples in this study. The lack of Histophilus is surprising because it has been considered an etiological agent for feedlot SA cases. The presence of M. alkalescens and M. wenyonii in SA joints suggest further research is needed to understand the impact of Mycoplasmopsis species other than M. bovis in the role of SA.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,136
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,274

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,193
Écart entre enseignants0,180 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)→Même sujetAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing→Travaux en français237 207→