Supporting participants with severe mental illness and associated cognitive deficits to engage in physical activity and sedentary behaviour research
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose: The Walking for Health (WORtH) study is a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a multi-component behaviour change intervention to support adults with severe mental illness (SMI) to increase their physical activity and reduce their sedentary behaviour(McDonough2021). People with SMI can experience deficits in several cognitive domains. When this was observed to influence participants’ engagement with the WORtH study, modifications were made to support their engagement with outcome assessment and intervention delivery.<br/>Methods: The WORtH study was conducted over a series of recruitment waves. A record was maintained of observations related to participant engagement. This record was supplemented by qualitative interviews with participants and the clinicians delivering the intervention. Findings were presented to the trial management group to identify modifications to procedures that were implemented in the subsequent recruitment wave.<br/>Findings: Observations from the first wave (n=9 participants) included the requirement for increased support from the clinical and research team to engage with intervention delivery, e.g., with scheduling and completing study materials, and both quantitative and qualitative outcome assessment, e.g., with completing paper-based assessments. Since cognitive function may have influenced participants’ engagement with the study, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment – Blind version was added to the baseline assessment as a potential explanatory measure. Other modifications included: shorter study sessions; appointment reminders; additional written study materials and instructions; and telephone support. Changes to the qualitative data collection included: inperson interviews, when possible; giving participants a summary of interview questions in advance; providing visual cues of the study components; and use of more closed questions and member checking. Service user involvement supported amendments to intervention delivery, including format of the education session to improve engagement, provision of additional study materials and training support for participants.<br/>Conclusions: Delivering and evaluating physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions with people with SMI can present challenges, and researchers need to be flexible and responsive in delivery. Ongoing dialogue with participants and other stakeholders is important to ensure appropriate modifications. The modifications detailed have enhanced the project to improve participant engagement with intervention delivery and outcome assessment and may be valuable for future research in this area.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».