Understanding womenâs preferences, choices and expectations of group versus individual prenatal care
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Context: The intent of group prenatal care is to enable better preparation for pregnancy and birth. It is essential to understand the factors that influence women to choose group versus individual prenatal care. This sub-study of a larger implementation project aims to explore women’s preconceptions, choices and expectations of care among both Canadian-born and immigrant women choosing between group and individual prenatal care. Objective: The objectives of this study were: (1) To understand the preconceptions women have of group prenatal care; (2) To explore the factors that influence women to choose group versus individual prenatal care; and (2) To describe the differences in expectations and choices of prenatal care between Canadian-born and immigrant women.Methods and Participants: This study adopted a qualitative descriptive approach. Participants of the study consisted of Canadian-born and immigrant pregnant women receiving individual (n = 6) and group (n = 6) prenatal care at an academic primary care clinic serving a multicultural population. Inclusion criteria included: age 18 or older, low-risk, singleton pregnancies, followed by a staff family physician, and fluency in French or English. Purposeful sampling was used to attain variation based on age, parity and elapsed time in Canada. Individual semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted either at clinic, home, or preferred location; interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A hybrid deductive-inductive approach was used to thematically analyze the data. Results: Nine main themes emerged from the interview data and presented as per the three study objectives. 1) Three main themes were identified for women’s preconceptions of group prenatal: a lack of understanding and unfamiliarity with group prenatal care; perceived benefits that attract women to group prenatal care; and concerns with a group format of care that may deter women from choosing this model. 2) Four themes emerged related to factors influencing women’s choices of prenatal care: feelings about pregnancy; prenatal care preferences; perceived need for and access to social support; and past experiences with healthcare providers. 3) Two themes emerged that illustrated two key differences in expectations of prenatal care between Canadian-born and immigrant women’s choices: overall expectations of prenatal care and cultural preferences in regards to type of healthcare provider and individual versus group care.Conclusions: Findings through this study indicate that a group prenatal care model is attractive to women seeking holistic care typical of midwifery. It appears that a group format of care may offer additional social support for some women seeking additional help, if their friends and family are less available in their social networks. In order to promote the model, providers of maternity care services should enhance efforts to inform women of the option to receive this type of care and address the concerns some women may have with privacy and adequate one-on-one time with the physician.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».