MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7063809788

AI-driven solutions for safeguarding IoT environments: an intrusion detection and prevention study

2024· other· en· W7063809788 sur OpenAlexfundno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueEspace École de technologie supérieure (École de technologie supérieure) · 2024
Typeother
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueMagnetic confinement fusion research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Mots-clésIntrusion detection systemSafeguardingInternet of ThingsAutomationIntrusion prevention systemInformation securityBlock (permutation group theory)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The progress in information and communication technologies (ICT) made in recent years has led to new revolutionary concepts where one of the most important ones is the Internet of Things (IoT). IoT, through low-cost connected objects, enables abundant and real-time data collection and smart automation of information and operation systems. The tremendous innovation opportunity opened by IoT has triggered its massive adoption in multiple business domains. Meanwhile, the impact of cyber-attacks has become more alarming for three main reasons: (1) critical weaknesses in IoT security mechanisms, (2) valuable data that attract cyber-attacks, and (3) the level of control that successful attacks could open in IoT-based automated systems. In this context, intrusion detection and prevention, which is essential in cyber-security, has become one of the most active research areas for securing IoT applications. Intrusion detection systems (IDSs) can analyze real-time activities to detect and report cyber-attacks to security administrators or automated intrusion prevention systems (IPSs) that initiate response measures to block the threats or attenuate their impact. However, given the changing and expanding nature of cyber-attacks, it is essential to design and implement new IDSs that are intelligent, accurate, fast, and scalable. In this vein, machine learning (ML), and particularly deep learning (DL), has emerged as a suitable approach to meet these requirements. \n \nIn this thesis, three main objectives essential for the design of an intelligent intrusion detection system are considered. These objectives are the detection of a wide range of IoT attacks, including zero-day attacks, the enhancement of the detection accuracy, and the minimization of the detection and response latency. To achieve these objectives, we analyze the cyber-attacks that target IoT systems and propose diverse features that can be used in ML algorithms to detect each of these attacks efficiently. Then, we implement and compare different learning algorithms, including shallow, deep, and ensemble learning methods, to propose models that enhance the detection accuracy. Furthermore, we design a collaborative learning scheme that enables low-latency detection and response to mitigate detected attacks. \n \nChapter 2 mainly studies the behaviors of different IoT attacks in a smart home scenario, and analyzes the quality of the features that can be extracted and employed in ML algorithms to detect each of these attacks efficiently. We propose various features that can improve the performance of ML-based IDSs. Specifically, transmission control protocol/internet protocol (TCP/IP) packet headers, time-based statistics, connection-based statistics, and TCP/IP packet content features are proposed. Furthermore, to detect attacks that exploit the wireless communication channel, more features are discussed, including the distance from the radio transmitter, radio-frequency fingerprint, received signal strength, signal-to-noise ratio, and the system’s energy profile. \n \nChapter 3 proposes a hybrid multistage deep neural networks (DNNs)-based intrusion detection and prevention system (IDPS) with improved accuracy for critical industrial control systems (ICSs) that cannot afford to compromise the security to improve latency. The learning models are trained sequentially with diverse algorithms, and each model in the sequence focuses on the limitations of the previous models. The resulting multistage DNN uses each stage’s decision in a combination function to produce a final decision with improved accuracy. \n \nIn contrast to Chapter 3 which considers a high-risk ICS scenario where enforced security is preferable even at the cost of latency, chapter 4 considers a mission-critical ICS scenario where latency is also a crucial requirement. In this context, first and foremost, we conduct a time complexity analysis of DNNs to illustrate how the structures of these models impact the training and prediction latency. Then, we design a low latency and robust deep learning-based collaborative IDPS that employs two levels of classifications. The first level performs a lightweight DNN-based anomaly detection in local servers to allow faster attack detection and emergency response measures. The second level performs attack classification of the anomalous traffic in cloud servers to guide complementary intrusion prevention tasks. Moreover, an SDN-based deployment architecture of the proposed collaborative IDPS in ICS networks is provided.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,301
Écart entre enseignants0,282 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEspace École de technologie supérieure (École de technologie supérieure)Même sujetMagnetic confinement fusion researchTravaux en français237 207