Applications of deep learning in visual recognition
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Animal welfare research has raised concerns regarding the intensification of farm animal housing systems that offer limited opportunity for movement. However, no currently available automated tracking software is able to efficiently and accurately track dairy cow movement across stall-based housing systems. Applying deep learning models to location tracking provides an opportunity for accurate and timely measurement of cow movement within the housing environment. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a location tracking tool to monitor the movement of dairy cows in their tie-stalls using a deep learning approach. Twenty-four lactating Holstein cows were video recorded for a continuous 24-h period on weeks 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, and 10. Individual images showing the in-stall position of each cow were extracted from each 24-h recording at a rate of one image per minute. Three coordinates on each cow were manually annotated on the image sequences to track the location of the left hip, the right hip, and the neck. The final dataset used to validate the deep learning approach consisted of 199,100 Red-Green-Blue images with manual coordinate annotations. The dataset was separated into training and validation sets. Variants of the following deep learning models were tested: VGG Net, Resnet, GoogLeNet, and DenseNet. Model performance was expressed in terms of pixel error for each coordinate annotated from the validation image set. Pixel error was converted to a standard measure in cm using the average pix/cm ratio for each cow in each week. ResNet18 with augmented labels significantly outperformed all other models tested. For the validation image set, the average error from all 3 coordinates was equivalent to a 0.74 cm error in actual physical placement of the coordinates within the stall environment. Based on this high degree of accuracy, the model may be used to analyze the activity patterns of individual cows for optimization of stall spaces and improved ease of movement. \n \nSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery captures the physical properties of the Earth by transmitting microwave signals to its surface and analyzing the backscattered signal. It does not depends on sunlight and therefore can be obtained in any condition, such as nighttime and cloudy weather. However, SAR images are noisier than light images and so far it is not clear the level of performance that a modern recognition system could achieve. This work presents an analysis of the performance of deep learning models for the task of land segmentation using SAR images. We present segmentation results on the task of classifying four different land categories (urban, water, vegetation and farm) on six Canadian sites (Montreal, Ottawa, Quebec, Saskatoon, Toronto and Vancouver), with three state-of-the-art deep learning segmentation models. Results show that when enough data and variety on the land appearance are available, deep learning models can achieve an excellent performance despite the high input noise.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».