Art or Con? Exploring Instapoetry at the Nexus of Influencer Culture, Author-Entrepreneurism, and Literary Innovation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation examines what it means to be a poet originating from social media, commercially driven spaces of digital culture and commerce, and the nexus of influencer culture and entrepreneurism that impacts contemporary literary production online. Situated at the intersection of Canadian literary studies, media studies, and cultural studies, my dissertation conducts case studies of three “instapoets” in Canada: Tenille Campbell, Rupi Kaur, and Najwa Zebian. In the mid-2010s, a type of born-digital poetry known as “instapoetry” exploded onto the literary scene via social media. Following the publication of Kaur’s Milk and Honey in 2014, which sold over six million copies, print poetry sales rose to record-breaking highs. Instapoetry combines textual, visual, and paratextual, forms, as well as personal, sartorial, and embodied elements in both print and digital formats. Instapoetry’s success triggered widespread debates about instapoetry’s literariness along sharply divided lines. Whereas some critics praise it as a type of poetic innovation, others denounce its failure to meet the standards of traditional poetry. Like instapoetry, this dissertation is a combination: it crosses disciplinary schools of thought and modes of analysis. It seeks to understand the extent to which instapoetry intersects with, on the one hand, established literary traditions, institutions, or histories, and, on the other, with the nested entrepreneurial and commercial interests of social media platforms. As such, it is structured from most to least “literary”—not in an evaluative sense, but rather clinically—in order to theorize how social media impacts the purposes to which poetry is put today; figures the author into a new type of media celebrity; and creates new spaces of literary community. Each case study analyzes primary textual material such as print poetry collections; social media content like images, captions, and comments; and popular interviews in literary magazines, journals, and podcasts. Chapter One focuses on Tenille Campbell. The poet, who is Dene and Métis, has appropriated the algorithm-controlled network of Instagram to write herself into an evolving Indigenous literary tradition and community of artists, writers, and entrepreneurs, bypassing the politics of Canadian publishing and defining herself as an Indigenous author. Chapter Two examines Rupi Kaur, who occupies a liminal position between traditional literary institutions and social media influence. A paraliterary figure, she straddles two territories, first, as a self-branded social media persona, and second, as a Canadian literary brand. This liminality breeds a sense of uneasiness within the Canadian literary scene, as it challenges the power and prestige of the literary establishment. Chapter Three looks at how poetry functions as primarily entrepreneurial material when it is specifically mobilized as self-care content, rendering a national framework irrelevant entirely. This poetry, while it appears “literary,” is valued not for its aesthetic purposes, but for its perceived ability to transform readers into better, happier, healed individuals. Instapoetry in Canada ultimately connects to larger transformations in the contemporary literary sphere as new and old ecosystems collide. The “instapoetry” label merely scratches the surface of a multi-platform, multi-media, and transnational phenomenon.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».