An Autobiographical Narrative Inquiry into my Personal Practical Knowledge: Awakening to Early Childhood Pedagogical Tensions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
My research is an inquiry into how I navigate between external expectations such as programmatic curriculum (Doyle, 1992), requested pedagogies, and internal beliefs and values derived from my personal practical knowledge (Clandinin, 1985). Reflecting on my lived experiences and using Schwab’s conceptualization of curriculum as a tool of analysis, I investigate my personal practical knowledge and how I act on it in my teaching. I employ autobiographical narrative inquiry methodology to explore the tensions and incompatibilities I experienced as an immigrant teacher of early childhood children in Saskatchewan, Canada. As a qualitative research methodology, narrative inquiry foregrounds “how humans make meaning of experience by endlessly telling and retelling stories about themselves that both refigure the past and create purpose in the future” (Connelly & Clandinin, 1988, p. 24). This methodology takes the form of stories (Saleh et al., 2014), presupposing “narrative as a kind of life story” (Connelly & Clandinin, 1988, p. 24). In researching theories to come to understand my unresolved feelings as an early childhood educator (ECE) and teacher of young children, I found that theory and practice do not always sit compatibly with each other (Schwab, 1973). As I shared my lived stories, and introduced the origins of my personal practical knowledge, I became aware of incompatibilities between some curriculum mandates and my own knowing. With that realization, I chose to make my narrative inquiry research methodology autobiographical. Studying my experiences in this autobiographical narrative inquiry, I engage in “telling and retelling, and reliving [to] deal with questions of who [I am] in the field [of education] and who [I am] in the texts that [I] write about my experiences [as a teacher]” (Clandinin & Connelly, 2000, p. 70). As I traced back to my early childhood, upbringing styles, learning experiences, mothering experiences, and my teaching practices, I realized that many of my understandings are rooted in my Confucian upbringing. I realized I also sought to overcome the limitations of this traditional approach by incorporating Western-based play and child-centred pedagogies into my teaching, learning, and mothering experiences. At the end of my thesis journey, I came to understand that a curriculum can represent one’s course of action in life, as the broad sense of curriculum encompasses a person’s life experiences (Connelly & Clandinin, 1988). Therefore, I am not only a curriculum implementer but I create curriculum collaboratively with my students in the classroom every day as we grow together.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,033 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».