MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7064294953

An Assessment of Chemical Exposure in Aviation

2025· other· en· W7064294953 sur OpenAlexfundno aff

Notice bibliographique

Revuee-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) · 2025
Typeother
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueMagnetic confinement fusion research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Mots-clésAviationContaminationOccupational exposureRisk assessmentExposure assessmentBreathing gasFouling
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Aircraft pneumatic systems are pressurized by air bled from the engines. This air and engine interaction can result in contamination of the air with intact, degraded, and pyrolyzed oil. Additionally, other pneumatically pressurized aircraft components, such as the hydraulic reservoirs, can contribute to chemical fouling of the air. The pneumatic system then facilitates the transport of this contaminated air to locations that allow for interactions with human receptors; most commercial aircraft use this bleed air to pressurize the cabin, and all use it to pressurize the onboard potable water systems. Human interactions with these contaminants, coupled with an increased prevalence of neurological illness and injury, anecdotally reported and described in cohorts of those who have careers in aviation, has led to our description of an associated occupational risk (Chapter 1). In this chapter, we systematically examine the available literature and describe several gaps in knowledge that, if addressed, could better qualify the chemical exposures and verify the pathways of contaminants from source to receptor. Of those knowledge gaps, three were the most pressing. Historical exposure to known contaminants of concern, in particular organophosphates like tricresyl phosphate, had been theorized to potentially contribute to pilot illness. The mechanisms of this historical exposure had yet to be explored. We completed an elemental assessment on new and used oil of small single-engine aircraft; this aircraft type is often used for training pilots prior to commercial flying careers (Chapter 2). In this oil, we found an enrichment of organophosphates in the used product, indicative of the addition of contaminants of concern as a fuel or oil additive. We also found elevated concentrations of lead in the used oil product (average concentration 5.77g kg-1), which described a significant enrichment from its source of leaded aviation fuel and is at concentrations capable of exposure-induced neurological injury. Additionally, in this chapter we examine a number of turboprop and jet aircraft oils and noted that phosphorus is lost from the new oil product with use at rates that exceed oil attrition. This validates the contaminant source determination of aircraft engine oil for organophosphates; the loss of the phosphorus from the oil implies its availability to the bleed air systems of the aircraft as either intact or degraded compounds. The second pressing knowledge gap identified described a previously unexamined contaminant pathway that originated in the engines and hydraulic reservoirs of aircraft and resulted in contamination of the potable water system due to the pneumatic connection with all aforementioned systems (Chapter 3). We qualitatively assessed the potable water onboard aircraft, utilizing liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry. We detected hydraulic oil (tributyl phosphate) in more than half of the unconcentrated water samples taken from flights and tentatively identified several additional organophosphates also in relatively high percentages (tris(chloropropyl) phosphate: 20%; triphenyl phosphate: 10%; tributoxyethyl phosphate: 10%). This confirmed the contamination pathway from the pneumatic system to the potable water and described a new exposure route for contaminants of concern to receptors that was undescribed by prior research. The contaminants known to be present on aircraft make up only a small fraction of the actual exposures that one experiences in the cabin environment. This is because previous assessments of the cabin had largely been targeted, sampling or monitoring the cabin for specific chemical compounds or classes, and completed with instrumentation (typically conventional Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry) that lacked the chromatographic resolution to detect and identify unknown compounds. We conducted the first non-targeted assessment of the aircraft cabin that was not restricted to a particular chemical class, and used this analytical technique to compare bleed air-pressurized and non-bleed air-pressurized aircraft (Chapter 4). Our analysis demonstrated increased contamination of bleed air pressurized aircraft in terms of compound number and abundance and tentatively identified contaminants associated with the degradation of aircraft engine oil (short-chain organic acids), exclusively on bleed air pressurized flights. This non-targeted assessment, contrary to previous comparison of aircraft in the literature, seems to demonstrate a marked difference in pressurization system-associated contamination, and helps verify cabin pressurization via the bleed air pneumatic system as a contaminant exposure pathway. When examining the results of the thesis as a whole, we have, through literature review, demonstrated a probable occupational risk and, through experimentation, shown that the risk may extend to training prior to employment in the commercial occupation. We have shown that the primary contaminant source, as described in the literature (aircraft engine oil), loses the element associated with the principal contaminant class of concern (phosphorus) with use, allowing the contaminant to enter bleed air systems as theorized. We have identified and validated a new source-to-receptor pathway involving the pneumatic and potable water systems on aircraft. And we have demonstrated, with a non-targeted qualitative chemical comparison with bleed-free aircraft, that pressurization of the cabin via bleed air from the engines is an important source of contamination, strengthening that pathway’s validity. While we have closed some of the knowledge gaps associated with chemical exposure and occupational risk in aviation, some remain to be answered. We hope that the contents of this thesis can influence decisions to mitigate some of this risk and inform future experimentation and research.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,796
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0920,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,274
Écart entre enseignants0,265 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuee-space (Manchester Metropolitan University)Même sujetMagnetic confinement fusion researchTravaux en français237 207