MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7064338676

The Association of Social Media Use and Psychiatric Diagnoses Among Missouri College Students

2023· article· en· W7064338676 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueIRL - University of Missouri, St. Louis (University of Missouri–St. Louis) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueMagnetic confinement fusion research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMental healthSocial mediaAnxietyAssociation (psychology)Social anxietyDescriptive statisticsMedical diagnosisPandemicEating disorders
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: “Many college students experience significant mental health difficulties, with the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbating these concerns (Sonet al., 2020). Mental health is significantly impacted by social media use, and this relationship has become increasingly complex after the COVID-19 pandemic (Haddad et al., 2021).” Research shows that depression, eating disorders, and anxiety are associated with more time spent on social media (Alam et al., 2021; Khan et al., 2019; Reighm et al., 2019; Sansha et al., 2017; Sidani et al., 2016). To follow-up on this research and assess the relationship between social media usage and psychiatric diagnoses among Missouri college students, we hypothesized that undergraduate students diagnosed with psychiatric disorders within the past year are spending more hours on social media per week. Methods: Cross-sectional data from 2022 were obtained from the Missouri College Health Behavior Survey (MACHB), a retrospective, self-report survey administered to undergraduate students at several universities in Missouri. Descriptive statistics were examined for social media use and the frequency of reported past-year diagnoses. A multiple regression model in SPSS was conducted to examine the effect of past-year diagnoses of anxiety, depression, PTSD, OCD/ADHD/ODD, sleep issues, and eating disorders on the average hours spent on social media per week. Results: The diagnosis of anxiety within the past year significantly predicted greater weekly use of social media (M = 19.30, SD = 17.90), compared to those without anxiety (M = 17.32, SD = 15.89), B = 2.06, p = .003. Students with PTSD spent significantly less time (M = 17.16, SD = 18.07) using social media than those not diagnosed (M = 18.09, SD = 16.54), B = -2.32, p = .029.nSimilarly, those with OCD/ADD/ADHD spent less time on social media (M = 17.28, SD = 16.68) than students not diagnosed (n = 3,264, M = 18.15, SD = 16.65), B = -1.68, p = .031. Past-year diagnoses of depression, eating disorders, and chronic sleep issues were not associated with social media use. Discussion: Students diagnosed with anxiety in the past year spend more time on social media than those who were not, consistent with previous research (Alam et al., 2021; Bettman et al., 2020; Maras et al., 2015; Riehm et al., 2019; Shensa et al., 2017; Vannucci et al., 2017). Contrary to hypotheses and prior research (Alam et al., 2021; Bettman et al., 2020; Khan et al., 2019; Maras et al., 2015; Riehm et al., 2019; Shensa et al., 2017), past-year OCD/ADD/ADHD and PTSD diagnoses were associated with less time spent on social media. However, viewing sensitive content on social media and experiencing cyber bullying has been found to elicit PTSD symptoms (McHugh et al. (2018), which can potentially help explain less time spent on social media among those diagnosed with PTSD. No associations were found between social media usage and eating disorders, major depressive disorder, or chronic sleep issues, despite some research highlighting associations with these disorders (Alam et al., 2021; Bettman et al., 2020; Khan et al., 2019; Maras et al., 2015; Riehm et al., 2019; Shensa et al., 2017; Sidani et al., 2016). Future research may include investigating the impact of social media usage on symptoms of anxiety disorders to determine directionality of the association. Additionally, Faulhaber et al. (2023) found that limiting social media use was associated with statistically significantly decreased anxiety compared to pretreatment. Further research testing various treatment approaches to decrease time spent on social media among individuals diagnosed with anxiety. References: Alam, M. K., Ali, F. B., Banik, R., Yasmin, S., & Salma, N. (2022). Assessing the mental health condition of home-confined university level students of Bangladesh due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Health, 30(7), 1685–1692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-021-01542-w Bettmann, J.E., Anstadt, G., Casselman, B. et al. Young Adult Depression and Anxiety Linked to Social Media Use: Assessment and Treatment. Clin Soc Work J 49, 368–379 (2021). https://doi-org.ezproxy.umsl.edu/10.1007/s10615-020-00752-1. Faulhaber, M. E., Lee, J. E., & Gentile, D. A. (2023). The Effect of Self-Monitoring Limited Social Media Use on Psychological Well-Being. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 4(2: Summer 2023). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000111. Haddad, J. M., Macenski, C., Mosier-Mills, A., Hibara, A., Kester, K., Schneider, M.,... & Liu, C. H. (2021). The impact of social media on college mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multinational review of the existing literature. Current psychiatry reports, 23, 1-12. Khan, A., Uddin, R., & Lee, E.-Y. (2021). Excessive recreational Internet use was associated with poor mental health in adolescents. Acta Paediatrica, 110(2), 571–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15528 Maras, D., Flament, M. F., Murray, M., Buchholz, A., Henderson, K. A., Obeid, N., & Goldfield, G. S. (2015). Screen time is associated with depression and anxiety in Canadian youth. Preventive medicine, 73, 133–138. https://doi-.org.ezproxy.umsl.edu/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.01.029. McHugh, B.C., Wisniewski, P., Rosson, M.B. and Carroll, J.M. (2018), "When social media traumatizes teens: The roles of online risk exposure, coping, and post-traumatic stress", Internet Research, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 1169-1188. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-02-2017-0077. Riehm, K. E., Feder, K. A., Tormohlen, K. N., Crum, R. M., Young, A. S., Green, K. M., Pacek, L. R., La Flair, L. N., & Mojtabai, R. (2019). Associations Between Time Spent Using Social Media and Internalizing and Externalizing Problems Among US Youth. JAMA Psychiatry, 76(12), 1266. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2325 Shensa, A., Escobar-Viera, C. G., Sidani, J. E., Bowman, N. D., Marshal, M. P., & Primack, B. A. (2017). Problematic social media use and depressive symptoms among U.S. young adults: A nationally-representative study. Social Science & Medicine, 182, 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.061 Sidani, J. E., Shensa, A., Hoffman, B., Hanmer, J., & Primack, B. A. (2016). The Association between Social Media Use and Eating Concerns among U.S. Young Adults. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 116(9), 1465–1472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2016.03.021 Son, C., Hegde, S., Smith, A., Wang, X., & Sasangohar, F. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on college students' mental health in the United States:Interview survey study. Journal of medical internet research, 22(9), e21279. Vannucci, A., Flannery, K. M., & Ohannessian, C. M. (2017). Social media use and anxiety in emerging adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 207, 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.040

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,110
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,219

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,218
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueIRL - University of Missouri, St. Louis (University of Missouri–St. Louis)Même sujetMagnetic confinement fusion researchTravaux en français237 207