” Clarinet Praxis” : How to best prepare for orchestra life. Advice and interviews with some of the main principal clarinetists in Europe.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This topic for the present thesis arose from the very reason I came to study at the KMH Royal College of Music of Stockholm where I have the opportunity to approach orchestral life in a direct manner, playing and collaborating with the great orchestras of the city and also to focus on orchestral repertoire, especially those excerpts which are required for auditions. In the last year I have spent a lot of time trying to understand how an orchestral musician can manage time better and prepare for any kind of situation, precisely because I have had so many chances to participate in major projects that the university has offered and also in long tours around Europe, Canada and Central America. The theme of the present thesis, therefore, is what how I find the life in the orchestras I’ve worked with. Tours show directly that playing and travelling for long periods of time can interfere with what we call the "physical form of the instrumentalist". The same thing happens when working for weeks on different productions, especially when you still must study and learn what may be a huge orchestral repertoire. An orchestra can be a place for meeting and learning, but in the long run you need to carve out a personal study space to better prepare for the sometimes-frenetic life of a musician. My own experience and the reports of other musicians have shown how complicated it is to make all the commitments coincide; in fact, thanks to this unusual research on a subject rarely discussed formally I have learned directly and indirectly how to organize successful the personal way of practice. In the research carried out, questions were asked to understand how orchestral musicians prepare some orchestral passages. I wanted to put attention to specific details, for example, sound control, the articulation of the various technical passages. I’ve chosen where possible regarding excerpts that not only have advanced my own experience but are also very important in the clarinet repertoire. In addition, I also wanted to talk about how important (and often essential) it is to have a flexible way of playing both in rehearsals and in concert. In presenting this research, my intention is also to discuss some facts from my personal experience as an orchestral musician and answers to many questions I have prepared for my teachers and perhaps future orchestral colleagues. The aim of this research is produce a report that is of use for any musician: one who already has worked in an orchestra or is still doing auditions, but also for teachers and students entering this environment, so as to allow everyone to explore and better understand this aspect of a musician's life. This has been a very interesting undertaking for me, and I believe an important one as it follows one of many paths, we musicians all take to reach the same goal.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».