Considerations on what moves us: autistic sociality and occupational justice
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Core philosophical assumptions in the practice of occupational therapy hold that humans can shape the state of their own health and sense of belonging to larger communities through opportunities to do and to create (Reilly, 1962). These assumptions are explicitly addressed in theory development around occupational justice, including the impact of occupational deprivation, marginalization, alienation and the like on well-being and social inclusion. Anthropologist Dawn Eddings Prince’s states “There were many times as a child I believed I would crumble in on myself, my emotional skeleton finally eaten away by the screaming and clutching of a modern society that dissolved me—normal life, other people call it” (Prince, 2010, p. 56). Her embodied experience of living asks us to reconsider what is the relationship between engagement in daily activities and participation when “normal” is experienced as “the screaming and clutching of a modern society” that eats away, crumbling and dissolving the very bones of existence. As an autist, her experience also asks us to reflect upon our assumptions of the relationship between engagement in daily activities and, as first put forth by Mary Reilly (1962) in her seminal work, “making a home in the world and making the world a home” (p. 2) from an occupational justice perspective.\nIn this panel, we will draw from funded ethnographic and participatory research conducted in Los Angeles and Montreal to examine how the experiences of children with autism and their families shifted our focus to the mundane, almost invisible, actions by which persons with autism and intimate others transform and transcend what is considered “normal” and create experimental scenes (Mattingly, 2010; Park, 2008) to re-envision, enact and embody a more just society. Taking as a starting point, Lawlor’s contribution of what it means to be a socially-occupied being “doing something with someone else that matters” (Lawlor, 2003, p. 430), we will highlight the ways in which our narrative and aesthetic conceptual frameworks highlighted significant moments and events that moved us and challenged us to refine our own own assumptions as occupational therapists and occupational scientists. We will also reflect on how these brief moments cross time, capturing both past experiences and future possibilities; and transcend immediate contexts, reconfiguring immediate physical space into places of being engaged and included in social worlds.\nKeywords: Sociality, Autism, Occupational justice\nQuestions:\n1. How is it that seemingly ordinary or mundane moments of life can be experienced as extraordinary?\n2. In what ways do narrative, aesthetic, and ethnographic approaches contribute to deeper understandings of engagement and participation for people with autism and their families?\n3. From a social accountability and occupational justice perspective, what is at stake in considering individuals with autism as socially occupied beings?\n4. Does a more focused application of principles of occupational justice generate better possibilities for enhancing participation for people with autism and their families?
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle