Curriculum-Based Dynamic Assessment of Narratives: Benefits for Bilingual Filipino Children
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In 2021, people of Filipino origin arriving in Canada reached nearly one million, leading to rising numbers of Filipino children in Canadian schools (Statistics Canada, 2022). Filipino-speaking children who display challenges in learning the language of instruction may be referred for language assessment. However, standardized assessments are often not suited to children acquiring a second language, leading to inaccurate conclusions regarding their abilities. This set of studies examines the benefits of a novel curriculum-based dynamic assessment (CBDA) developed to assess the narrative abilities of children acquiring English as a second language. \nStudy 1 examined the accuracy of the CBDA in distinguishing typical language development (TD) from language difficulties (LD) for 34 bilingual Filipino children and compared the classification accuracy to the Test of Narrative Language – Second Edition (TNL-2; Gillam & Pearson, 2017). The results showed that the CDBA was an excellent predictor of language ability. \nStudy 2 examined narrative microstructure for children from Study 1 at pretest and posttest. Children in the TD group scored higher than the LD group on productivity measures at both pretest and posttest and on complexity measures at pretest. The TD group also improved on the productivity measures, while the LD group did not change on either the productivity or complexity measures. \nStudy 3 explored the modifiability ratings and performance on the TNL-2 of four kindergarten children with LD who participated in the first two studies, using a multiple case-study design. All four children showed difficulties answering wh-questions appropriately and warranted high examiner effort. They displayed differences in their learning preferences and potential and performed differently from one another on the TNL-2. \nStudy 4 explored Filipino-Canadian parents’ views on Filipino children’s narratives and on the usefulness of the CBDA through focus groups. They indicated that the story content was influenced by personal experiences common in the Filipino culture and described “good” stories as elaborated and structured in keeping with story grammar models. Lastly, parents appreciated the CBDA's focus on individual capabilities and its cultural sensitivity. \nTogether, the studies provide evidence that the CBDA of narratives is valuable for assessing Filipino- and English-speaking children and contributes to research on dynamic assessment for bilingual children.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».