Development and transferability of advanced econometric models of bikesharing demand in urban settings
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Bikesharing systems (BSS) are becoming increasingly popular in urban areas around the world, as demonstrated by the rapid growth of both the number and the size of these systems in recent years. Understanding and predicting BSS usage patterns is complex, especially because these patterns are often tied to local factors. This thesis aims to contribute to the existing literature on BSS in two ways. First, an econometric model featuring bicycle availability at a station level as a direct metric of analysis is developed. This behaviorally quantitative model accounts for the influence of temporal, meteorological, bicycle infrastructure, built environment and land-use attributes on bicycle availability. More specifically, an ordered regression model - panel mixed generalized ordered logit model - is estimated to accommodate for the influence of exogenous variables and station level unobserved factors. The model estimation is undertaken using BIXI-Montreal data from the summer of 2012. The results show BIXI is used more in the afternoon than in the morning, dense areas tend to be associated with lower availability levels, and interactions of time of day with land use impact availability. The estimated model is validated using a hold-out sample of data from the summer of 2013. The results clearly highlight the satisfactory performance of the proposed framework. The model developed can be employed by BSS operators to arrive at hourly system state predictions and used for rebalancing operations. To illustrate its applicability, an availability prediction exercise is also undertaken. A review of the existing BSS literature indicates that the framework presented in this thesis is the first to model bicycle availability in BSS using detailed temporal and spatial scales. As such, this thesis contributes to advancing the state-of-the-art toolkit available to BSS planners worldwide, and especially in Montreal.Second, a BSS model transferability exercise is conducted using a detailed arrivals and departures framework developed for Montreal by Faghih-Imani et al. (2014) and applying it to data from New York. This allows a direct comparison of the influence of temporal, meteorological, bicycle infrastructure, built environment and land-use variables on BSS usage in these two cities. Results show significant overlap in the influence of weather variables, bicycle infrastructure, and several land-use attributes. However, temporal trends – especially weekend usage patterns – are very different in both cities. Overall, our results are promising for the development of transferable models of bicycle flows in urban areas. It should be noted that this research effort is the first to investigate BSS model transferability between two large cities using a detailed arrivals and departures model that takes into account temporal, meteorological, bicycle infrastructure, built environment and land-use variables.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».