Emotional Intelligence and Leadership Styles Among Managers in Primary Healthcare Centers, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aeshah Abdullah Alasmari,1 Raseel Abdulaziz Awad,2 Abdulmajeed Mohamed Alshowair,3 Saad M Albattal,4 Abdulmajeed Homaidan AlMutairi,4 Amro Abdel-Azeem,5 Mostafa Kofi4 1Family Medicine Department, Riyadh First Health Cluster Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2Al-Murabba PHC, Riyadh First Health Cluster Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 3VP Community Health Excellence, Riyadh First Health Cluster Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 4Family Medicine Department, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Ministry of Defense Health Services, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 5Population Health Management and Research, Riyadh First Health Cluster Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Mostafa Kofi, Family Medicine Department, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Ministry of Defense Health Services, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Tel +966501436859, Email Moustafafouad@yahoo.com Amro Abdel-Azeem, Population Health Management and Research, Riyadh First Health Cluster Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Tel +966547135224, Email dr_amro_osh@hotmail.comPurpose: Effective leadership is one of the most important factors contributing to an organization’s effectiveness and success. The objective of this study is to identify the leadership styles of primary healthcare managers and explore associated sociodemographic factors.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, among primary healthcare managers in different aspects of 6 primary healthcare centers (PHC). Data were collected using a self-assessment questionnaire composed of two main sections: sociodemographic characteristics of the participants and the emotional intelligence questionnaire to assess the various competencies of emotional intelligence of leadership style.Results: A total of 50 primary healthcare managers were included in the study. Approximately half of them (52%) were aged between 35 and 44 years. The highest applied statement was “I know when I am happy (4.42± 0.95)”, whereas the lowest applied statement was “I rarely worry about work or life in general (3.20± 1.26)”. Self-awareness was considered a strength in most of the participants (78%), while, managing emotions needs attention in 52% of them. Intrinsic motivating, empathy, and social skill were considered strengths in most of the participants (70%, 74%, and 68%, respectively). Participants aged (25– 34 years) were more likely than others to need attention in the component of “intrinsic motivating” (31.6%), p=0.053. Single participants were more likely than married participants to need attention in the component of “intrinsic motivating” (70% versus 18.4%). P=0.006. Nurses, pharmacists and radiologists were more likely to need attention in the component of “self-awareness” than doctors and directors, p = 0.041.Conclusion: This study highlights the significance of emotional intelligence components, such as self-awareness, empathy, and social skills, as strengths among primary healthcare managers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The findings emphasize that enhancing emotional intelligence is essential for fostering effective leadership within primary healthcare sitting.Keywords: leadership styles, emotional intelligence questionnaire, primary healthcare centers, healthcare management, transformational leadership, vision 2030
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».