Evaluation of a 3M Petrifilm on-farm milk culture system for use in selective dry cow therapy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As an alternative to blanket dry cow therapy (BDCT), selective dry cow therapy (SDCT) is considered a more judicious approach to antimicrobial use for the purpose of mastitis control during the non-lactating period. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the utility of a 3M Petrifilm-based on-farm milk culture system (OFCS) for use in a SDCT program. A randomized clinical trial was conducted using 16 low bulk tank somatic cell count (<250,000 cells/mL) dairy herds from Prince Edward Island (n = 10) and Quebec (n = 6), Canada. When used to detect intramammary infection (IMI) in cows at drying off, the OFCS performed well with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 73%. By comparing producer-derived Petrifilm results to those obtained using an accurate automated reader, it was determined that producers were able to correctly interpret Petrifilm results with an observed agreement of 91% and kappa value of 0.82. The study groups comprising the clinical trial were a positive control group consisting of cows receiving blanket application of dry cow therapy (DCT) with the addition of an internal teat sealant (ITS), and the OFCS group consisting of cows selectively treated at drying off based on OFCS results with ITS alone (Petrifilm negative) or DCT + ITS (Petrifilm positive). No significant differences in postcalving IMI risk and risk of clinical mastitis in the first 120 days of the subsequent lactation were detected between the study groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between study groups regarding test day milk yield and somatic cell count in the first 180 days of the subsequent lactation. Petrifilm-OFCS-based SDCT enabled a reduction in DCT of 21% as compared to BDCT. The effect of ITS on the interdependence of quarters towards the acquisition of new IMI (NIMI) with coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) over the dry period was also investigated. It was demonstrated that in cows that were infused with ITS, the presence of CNS in another quarter at drying off was a risk factor for CNS NIMI, but this association was absent in cows without ITS infusion. This unexpected finding may have resulted from inadvertent introduction of CNS during ITS infusion. In quarters of cows without a CNS IMI at drying off (i.e. without a source of contagious CNS), ITS was protective against CNS NIMI suggesting that CNS infection over the non-lactating period can be partly attributed to CNS species located within the environment.\nAccording to economic analyses, OFCS-based SDCT resulted in a marginally higher total cost per cow than BDCT. However, OFCS-based SDCT provided the combined benefits of lowering DCT treatment risk without increasing the risk of postcalving IMI, and was superior economically to a SDCT program based on somatic cell count and clinical mastitis history. Overall, the Petrifilm OFCS was an accurate diagnostic tool that was effective in reducing DCT use without compromising the health, welfare, and future milk production of the cow.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».