ERIC ED540047: 2011 Admissions and Transfer Experiences of Students Continuing the Studies in British Columbia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This report presents the results of an analysis of admissions and transfer data from the 2011 BC Diploma, Associate Degree, and Certificate Student Outcomes (DACSO) Survey (formerly the BC College and Institute Student Outcomes Survey). This province-wide survey contacted former students 9 to 20 months after they completed all, or a significant portion, of their programs of study. It addressed a number of issues related to their admissions and transfer experiences from BC's college, teaching-intensive university, and institute sector. This report is similar to a report released by the Council in 2008, titled "2008 Admissions and Transfer Experiences of Students Continuing their Studies in British Columbia" and the Council's 2005 and 2002 version of the same report. This current report contains updated information from the 2011 cohort and comparisons with previous surveys. With respect to admissions, this report explores the direction and magnitude of student flows between institutions in the BC public post-secondary system. It also explores the extent to which students are able to access the institutions, programs, and courses of their choice. On the transfer side, this report profiles students who expected to transfer credits between institutions and identifies where in the system the majority of students who did not realize their transfer expectations are concentrated. For the first time, the report takes an in-depth look at responses to a special series of questions that focus on respondents who were dissatisfied with their overall transfer experience. The goal is to learn more about why they were dissatisfied and how their transfer experience might have been improved. The survey results show that the admissions and transfer system in BC is working very well for students who continue their studies after having studied in the BC college, teaching-intensive university, and institute sector. Since 2002, there has been steady growth in the proportion of students continuing their studies at the same institution, as opposed to transferring to a different institution. Appended are: (1) Relevant Questions from the BC Diploma, Associate Degree, and Certificate of Student Outcomes Survey; (2) About the BC Diploma, Associate Degree, and Certificate Student Outcomes Survey Cohort; and (3) Glossary of Terms. (Contains 32 tables, 16 figures, and 11 footnotes.) [Contributing authors are Devron Gaber and Jean Karlinski.]
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,172 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».