MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7065900785

Features of taxation of forestry enterprises

2018· article· en· W7065900785 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueElectronic Scientific Archive (Lviv Polytechnic) · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueEconomic and Business Development Strategies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPaymentCommunity forestryAgency (philosophy)Relevance (law)State (computer science)Natural resource
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The article deals with the features of\ntaxation of forestry enterprises. The domestic practice of\ntax calculation and payment by enterprises of the State\nForestry Agency of Ukraine and the foreign experience\nof taxation of forestry enterprises are researched.\nParticular attention is paid to resource payments of\nforestry enterprises, and rent for the special use of forest\nresources in particular. The essence of the research has\nbeen studied, and the payments to the state and local\nbudgets of the rent for the special use of forest resources\nhave been analyzed. The focus is on the recent changes\nin taxation of forest enterprises and their financing.\nThe article determines the relevance of studying\nthe problem of taxation of forestry enterprises and\nfocuses on its financing, which hinders the process of\nreforestation and forest conservation. It is emphasized\nthat taxation of forestry enterprises should stimulate\nentrepreneurial initiative, be simple and understandable\nand ensure the efficiency of the collecting taxes process.\nThe purpose of the article is to consider the\npeculiarities of the taxation of forestry enterprises,\nwhich are subordinated to the State Forestry Agency of\nUkraine.\nThe research objective is to analyze the tax\npayments paid by forestry enterprises, to investigate the\nnature of rent payments, the rent for the special use of\nforest resources in particular, to study the latest changes\nin taxation of forestry enterprises and financing of\nforestry measures.\nIn the course of the survey it was determined that\nforestry enterprises are in the general system of taxation\nand pay taxes, fees (including for the use of forestry\nresources), which are determined by the Tax Code of\nUkraine. In the part of taxes on the use of natural\nresources special for forestry the rent for the special use\nof natural resources is particular.\nThe analysis of tax payments paid by enterprises\nof forestry is carried out. According to the results of the\nactivity of the state enterprises of the forest industry for\nUAH 1 of the received budget funds for forestry and\nhunting, guard and protection of forests, there were paid\nUAH 8 in 2015 and UAH 64 in 2016 taxes and\npayments.\nThe nature of rent payments, rent for the special\nuse of forest resources in particular, is investigated;\ntaxpayers, the object and the base of taxation, features of\naccrual and payment are defined.\nAnalyzing the payment of taxes and fees by state\nenterprises of the State Agency of Forest Resources of\nUkraine for 2015–2017, the distribution of the rent for\nthe special use of forest resources within the state and\nlocal budgets was 56 % / 44 %, respectively.\nThe experience of foreign countries regarding\ntaxation of the forestry enterprises has been studied. It\nprimarily involves the clear definition of ownership of\nforests, the access and the use of forests, the use of new\ntrends in sustainable forest management and\nenvironmentally sound technologies, which are taken\ninto account when defining the policy of taxation of\nforest owners. Analyzing the objects from which taxes\nare levied in forestry in such economically developed\ncountries such as Canada and the USA, Germany,\nPoland, it is determined that the main ones are wood,\nlogging, land, forest rights\nThe article focuses on the latest changes\nregarding taxation of forestry enterprises and financing\nof the forestry measures. The decision to create a fund of\na state development of forestry, its source of formation\nand directions of the use of the funds are considered. It is noted that the decision of issues of taxation\nof forestry enterprises is of strategic importance not only\nfor the national economy, but also for the ecological\nsafety of Europe. Taxes paid by forestry enterprises are\nfiscal, but the ecologization of the tax system should\ninclude state support for the conservation of the forest\nfund and be accompanied by the integration of forestry\nproducts into the industry of the country. This provides\nadditional economic and environmental benefits.\nThe use of taxes in domestic practice, that allow\nthe removal of part of the rent and net profits of forestry\nenterprises to finance the recreation of forest resources\nwill promote the stimulation of ecologically balanced\nand sustainable forest management.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,346
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,651

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,218
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle