Forts versus ships : also Defense of Canadian lakes and its influence on the general defence of Canada, /c by an Officer.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The account of the fight between the " Merri- mac" and u Monitor/' and its results, threw England into a state of monomania.Ships with armour could g-o any where, and do anything-; as to forts, they were of no account.In deference to the ge- neral feeling-, Ministers reassembled the DefenceCommission to take further evidence, with a view to determine whether it mig-ht not be expedient to sus- pend the construction of the costly permanent forts, which were intended to serve as advanced posts for the protection of our harbours and dockyards.A few days later it was announced in the House of Commons and in all the newspapers that the tables had been completely turned, and that the results of an experiment at Shoeburyness had tri- umphantly and conclusively restored the ancient superiority of g-uns over the sides of floating-struc- tures.Several shots (156-pounders) fired out of the Armstrong" 12-ton gun, with a charge of 50 lbs. of powder, had gone through the target representing a section of the " Warrior's" side as if it had been paper ; with such force indeed that the Secretary of the Admiralty said it would probably have gone through the other side of the ship also.Forts were again in the ascendant, and nothing could withstand them.The Defence Commission adhered to its first opinion, and the building of the forts, suspended for a time, was to be at once resumed.News of the engagement at New Orleans next arrived to turn the vane of opinion round once more.This time ships-and it was confidently as- serted wooden ships-had successfully engaged forts, and forced the obstructions, which had been deliberately prepared in a river, under the fire of the batteries.While men's minds were thus unsettled, it was revealed to the public that the trial at Shoeburyness above referred to, which was supposed to have resulted in the decisive triumph of the Armstrong gun, had received a very false colouring.The fact was, as stated,thatthe target had one of its plates perforated by the first shot, fired from the distance of 200 yards with 4') pounds of powder ; but it w T as not stated that this plate had been much shaken in a former trial, having been struck almost on the same spot by eleven successive shots, of which three were solid 200-pounders, three solid 100-pounders,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,021 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».